Finite Temperature Density Matrix Calculation

bowlbase
Messages
145
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Consider the Hamiltonian ##H=\begin{bmatrix} 0& \frac{-iw}{2}\\ \frac{iw}{2} & 0 \end{bmatrix}##
Write the finite temperature density of the matrix ##\rho(T)##

Homework Equations


##\beta=\frac{1}{kT}##

The Attempt at a Solution


The initial part of the problem had me find the eigenvectors and eigenvalues. I got ##\lambda=\pm\frac{w}{2}## and eigenvectors ##v_1=(-i, 1)## and ##v_1=(i, 1)##

Not quite sure what to do with it from here. I know that ##\rho=e^{-\beta E_1} | \psi_1 \rangle \langle \psi_1 |+e^{-\beta E_2} | \psi_2 \rangle \langle \psi_2 |##

I think I remember that the eigenvalues are suppose to be ##E_{1,2}##. But I don't know what ##\psi_{1,2}## are suppose to be.

Further, my notes show that once I have the matrix I should have a fraction that looks something like ##\frac{1}{2z}## where ##z## is the sum ##z=e^{-\beta E_1}+e^{-\beta E_2}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
|\psi_1 \rangle and |\psi_2 \rangle are normalized eigenvectors of the Hamiltonian. You have the eigenvectors, you just need to normalize them.
About the factor of \frac{1}{2z}, the density operator \rho should have unit trace. But I don't think there should be a factor \frac 1 2 there!
 
I got it figured it out. I just couldn't find it in my textbook. Turns out in was in recommended reading I guess. Thanks for the help though.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top