Firing an object into orbit using a moon's gravity

  • Thread starter Thread starter guss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Orbit
AI Thread Summary
Launching an object into orbit using a moon's gravity is theoretically possible by carefully calculating the speed and direction of the launch. If the object is fired at a speed above the planet's escape velocity but below the combined escape velocity of the planet and moon, it may achieve a stable orbit around the planet. The discussion highlights that while a direct launch without rockets typically results in a return to the starting point, utilizing the moon's gravitational influence could allow for a trajectory that leads to a different orbit. However, concerns about the stability of such an orbit and potential issues upon subsequent passes near the moon are noted. Overall, the concept hinges on precise calculations and understanding of gravitational dynamics.
guss
Messages
246
Reaction score
0
Let's say I'm on a planet and I have a space "gun" that can launch an object upwards at any speed in any direction.

Typically with this, you could not launch an object without any rockets into orbit because the best you could do is make the object loop around the planet to exactly where it started.

Now, introduce a moon orbiting the same planet. Using this moon's gravity, is it possible to construct a speed and direction for the object to be shot at so that it ends up in an orbit around the main planet?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
guss said:
Typically with this, you could not launch an object without any rockets into orbit because the best you could do is make the object loop around the planet to exactly where it started.

Are you sure about that?
 
guss said:
Typically with this, you could not launch an object without any rockets into orbit because the best you could do is make the object loop around the planet to exactly where it started.
That's an orbit too. I guess you mean some other orbit, which doesn't return to the launch point. If you include air resitance in the atmosphere this is allready the case. You can fire it above escape velocity, but it will lose some speed in the atmosphere. But I'm not sure you could achieve a stable orbit above the atmosphere this way.

guss said:
Now, introduce a moon orbiting the same planet. Using this moon's gravity, is it possible to construct a speed and direction for the object to be shot at so that it ends up in an orbit around the main planet?
Maybe if you launch it above the Planet's escape velocity, but below the Planet+Moon escape velocity?
 
guss said:
Typically with this, you could not launch an object without any rockets into orbit because the best you could do is make the object loop around the planet to exactly where it started.

Maybe not in principle but absolutely right if you are talking about a 'normal' orbit around the Earth. With a lot of care, you could organise a 'cannon' shot to pass close enough to the Moon to deflect the craft into an orbit that would not return to its launch point. I suspect that this orbit could give you trouble 'next time around' if it came close to the Moon again and it might not be too stable. You would be after an elliptical orbit with fairly low eccentricity, I presume?
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks
I am attempting to use a Raman TruScan with a 785 nm laser to read a material for identification purposes. The material causes too much fluorescence and doesn’t not produce a good signal. However another lab is able to produce a good signal consistently using the same Raman model and sample material. What would be the reason for the different results between instruments?
Back
Top