Firing Cannon to Start Avalanche: Angle Calculation

AI Thread Summary
To determine the angle at which a cannon should be fired to start an avalanche, the problem involves a cannon with a muzzle speed of 1000 m/s, positioned 1000 m horizontally and 500 m vertically from the target. The equations of motion are set up using the horizontal and vertical components, leading to a quadratic equation in terms of tan θ. The derived equation is tan² θ - 203.874 tan θ + 102.937 = 0, which can be solved using the quadratic formula. Substituting back to find θ will yield the required firing angle. This method effectively combines projectile motion principles with trigonometric identities to solve for the angle.
deezy
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cannon has a muzzle speed of 1000 m/s, and it is used to start an avalanche on a mountain 1000 m from the cannon horizontally and 500 m above the cannon. What angle above the horizontal should the cannon be fired?

v_0 = 1000 m/s
y_t = 500 m
x_t = 1000 m

Homework Equations


x_t = x_0 + v_0 cos \theta t
y_t = y_0 + v_0 sin \theta t - g t^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know if this approach is right but I tried a system of equations:

1000 = 1000 cos \theta t
1 = cos \theta t
t = \frac{1}{cos \theta}

I tried substituting t from the first equation into this one:
500 = 1000 sin \theta t - (1/2)(9.81)t^2
500 = 1000 sin \theta t - (1/2)(9.81)t^2
500 = 1000 \frac {sin \theta }{cos \theta} - \frac{(4.905)}{cos ^2 \theta}
500 = 1000 tan \theta - (4.905)sec \theta

But I didn't know how to solve for theta. Is this the right approach, or is there an easier way to do this problem?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should get in the habit of plugging numbers in only near the end. Using a trig identity, you get:
\begin{align*}
y_t &= x_t \tan\theta - x_t^2\left(\frac{g}{2v_0^2}\right)\sec^2 \theta \\
&= x_t \tan\theta - x_t^2\left(\frac{g}{2v_0^2}\right)(1+\tan^2 \theta)
\end{align*}
That's quadratic in tan θ. (I'd plug the numbers in now.) Can you take it from here?
 
Plugging in from that point I got:

500 = 1000 tan \theta - \frac {1000^2}{2*1000^2}*9.81(1+tan^2 \theta)

Which simplified to:

tan^2 \theta - 203.874 tan \theta + 102.937 = 0

I get stuck here. Not sure how to solve this... my idea was let x = tan \theta and solve x using the quadratic formula, then plug tan \theta back in for x to find the angle. Does this work?
 
Yes, that'll work.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top