First-Order Extrema in Classical Mechanics , Theoretical Minimum

morangta
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
First-Order Extrema in "Classical Mechanics", Theoretical Minimum

In the 3rd lecture of Classical Mechanics, 2011, by Dr. Susskind in his Theoretical Minimum series, he talks about calculating extrema, saddle points, etc. to "first order".

"if you move a little bit, the potential is zero, to first order"

What does he mean, first order? When I was in college in the 60's, if we wanted better accuracy, we just made Δx smaller, and eventually got the accuracy we wanted.

No one talked about "first order" in the 60's. I think I would have remembered. Maybe not. I've noticed he keeps saying that. Is there something new in math and physics that I am not aware of?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
He is talking about expanding the equation in a taylor series around the minimum

example

y(x) = sqrt(a^2-x^2) ; for x<<1 y(x) = sqrt(1 -(x/a)^2) ~ 1- (1/2)*(x/a)^2 and this would be to first order
 
What does that have to do with the stationary points?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
654
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top