Flat Plate Deflection & stress - HDPE

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around analyzing flat plates made of HDPE under hydrostatic water pressures, highlighting the challenge of adapting existing formulas that are primarily based on steel's properties. The Poisson's ratio for HDPE is noted to be higher (0.38-0.4), complicating the use of standard equations. For deflection, it is suggested to use the same formulas as for steel, substituting in the modulus of elasticity for HDPE. For stress calculations, a method is proposed to adjust the stress values by a factor derived from the ratio of Poisson's ratios, although this factor may be conservative. The conversation emphasizes the importance of using valid yield stress values and suggests limiting loads to less than 40% of yield stress for safety.
Antony S
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm trying to carryout some analysis of flat plates subjected to hydrostatic water pressures however the plate material is HDPE.

The problem I'm having is that all the formulae on the web and in Roark's 7th Edition are typical of steel with a Poisson's ratio of 0.3. I can't therefore find how to change the formulae or constants to account for the larger Poission's ratio that would be expected with HDPE (0.38-0.4).

To keep things simple I'm just considering a rectangular plate with fixed edges and a uniform UDL over the whole area as opposed to a triangulated load.

Can anybody offer advice on how best to deal with the stress and deflection of an HDPE plate?

Thanks in advance...
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
This is a good question. I know the errors in these formulas are no more than 3% for Poisson's ratio (PR) of 0.26 to 0.34 (REF: Machinery Handbook).

For the deflection, you can just use the same formula and the modulus of elasticity of HDPE.

For the stress, one possible method is as follows. From, the definition of PR, your HDPE will have a decease in diamater ("neck down") compared to PR=3 by the ratio: 0.4 / 0.3. So the area will decrease by the ratio: (0.4 / 0.3)^2 = 1.78.

Thus, for initial estimating, I would multiply the stresses you calculate by a factor of 1.78. Be sure to use a valid value of yield stress. And I would recommend limiting your loads to less than 40% yield stress.

EDIT:

I have a feeling my 1.78 factor on calculated stresses is too high (but will provide conservative results).
 
Last edited:
Thank you, this will be a good starting point.
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
TL;DR Summary: Heard in the news about using sonar to locate the sub Hello : After the sinking of the ship near the Greek shores , carrying of alot of people , there was another accident that include 5 tourists and a submarine visiting the titanic , which went missing Some technical notes captured my attention, that there us few sonar devices are hearing sounds repeated every 30 seconds , but they are not able to locate the source Is it possible that the sound waves are reflecting from...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...
Back
Top