Flow of liquid through a hole and distance traveled

jcy128
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


if the flow rate of a liquid from a 10mm hole in a storage tank holding 5m of a liquid with a density of 490 kg/s, is 0.207 kg/s how far will this stream travel before it hits the ground and will it be contained by a dike 1 m away that is 1 m high

Homework Equations



Q=pAV => Q/pA = V
s=ut+1/2at^2
v=d/t

The Attempt at a Solution


so using the eqn Q/pA = V i get a resultant velocity of 5.45 m/s
using the vectors for the horizontal and vertical distances and the eqn s=ut+1/2at^2 I found that with this velocity the stream will travel for 0.7824s
and then using the eqn v=d/t and changing it to find distnace vt= d i found that the stream would travel 4.26m

I am uncertain how to calculate how to determine if the dike will contain the flow, I believe it won't due to the height of the hole and the mass flow rate and velocity of the stream
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Hi jcy128! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(try using the X2 tag just above the Reply box :wink:)

Your method is correct, but I don't get 5.45 for v, and you seem to have used 3m instead of 5m for t.

For the last part of the question, simply find how long it takes to fall to the level of the top of the dyke, and then see how far it has moved horizontally. :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top