Flow rate and velocity form a Conical tank.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the flow rate and pressure from a conical water tank with a radius of 60 inches and a height of 120 inches, featuring a 3-inch nozzle at the tip. It is noted that the flow rate is not constant and varies with the water height in the tank. To solve the problem, the continuity equation, Bernoulli's principle, and Torricelli's theorem are suggested as essential tools. The participants express a need for a concrete solution to the problem. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities involved in fluid dynamics related to conical tanks.
dilipbhanu
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I am working on a Hydro project. Just can't get this right.

I have a water tank (cone shaped) with Radius 60 Inches and height 120 Inches. The Tip of the cone has a nozzle with a 3 inch opening. If the Air pressure is ignored. What will be the flow rate of water and pressure. ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hm.. interesting question, i do not have a solution myself, but here are some stuff that comes to my mind while thinking of this question.

The flow rate is not constant, as flow rate depend on height of the water that is in the conical tank. therefore, as the water level in the tank decreases, the flow rate at the nozzle varies.

seem like we need to apply the continuity equation, Bernoulli's principle and Torricelli theorem.

thats all i can think of, would be nice if someone can come up with a solution for this =D
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top