Flow velocity out of a rectangluar nozzle

AI Thread Summary
To calculate the flow velocity out of a rectangular nozzle, one can relate the volumetric flow rate (300 CFM) to the nozzle's cross-sectional area (4.5" x 0.5"). Assuming uniform flow across the nozzle simplifies the calculation, allowing for a rough estimate of velocity by dividing the flow rate by the area. Compressibility is generally not a concern in this scenario since the duct is open and not under pressure. The length of the hose can be disregarded for this calculation, focusing instead on the nozzle size. For precise applications, accounting for flow variations near the walls may be necessary, but for general purposes, the rough estimate suffices.
Seth_eplmf
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello, I'm having a hard time coming up with a flow velocity out of a nozzle.

I have a fan that is putting 300 cfm of air through a 3" ID hose. The 3" hose is 45in long, and ends with a rectangular nozzle that has an opening 4.5" x 0.5".

Any help would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How would one relate volumetric flow rate with duct flow area and mean air velocity?

Does one have to account for compressibility?
 
The duct is open at the end, so there is not pressure.

Let me ask this: If you have the nozzle at the end of a hose, would you do the calculation assuming the duct is the size of said nozzle and length doesn't matter (not worried about loss)?
 
How accurate do you need your answer to be? If you know the 300CFM is accurate, you could simply take the cross sectional area of the nozzle and assume uniform flow across the nozzle and get a rough answer that way. The real answer will be a bit faster, since the flow at the walls will be slower (so the central flow needs to be faster to maintain the volumetric flow rate), but I wouldn't bother with that unless you need a very precise answer for some reason.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
63K
Back
Top