Fluid dynamics (2nd year undergrad) question on jet incident on a plate

hai2410
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A circular jet of water of radius r1 is propelled vertically downwards and hits
a circular plate of radius r2 (> r1 ) so that the centre of the jet is incident onto the
centre of the plate. The velocity of the jet as it hits the plate is v and is normal to
the plate.

Show that for a plate of radius r=\sqrt(2)r1 the net force on the plate due to the
change in momentum of the fluid and the differences in pressure on each side of
the plate is zero.

[You may assume that the velocity of the water changes direction from being
normal to the plate to lying in the plane of the plate as it hits the front of the plate
and that the rear of the plate is covered by a layer of the water that has been
brought to rest.]



Homework Equations



Bernoulli:
0.5p v^2 + P =constant (p being density, P being pressure, v being velocity)

The Attempt at a Solution



I can find out the thickness of the film as a function of radial distance from centre under the assumption that the pressure is equal on the surface of the jet as it was in the incident jet [and thus using Bernoulli and conservation of mass], and I can work out the force on the plate due to the change in momentum of the jet normal to the plate.

I can also work out for a particular stagnation point above the centre of the plate, that the pressure [by Bernoulli] is P0 + 0.5pv0^2 where I've called the jet initial pressure P0, and initial velocity v0.

However both of these forces would act down on the plate, so that it was blasted away from the incident jet (as you'd expect in real life). I therefore can't think of any force which would act toward the jet, and so have no idea how to solve this problem.

Thanks for any help you can give! :)
PS for this part you don't take into account the weight of the fluid, that comes later apparently
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hai2410 said:
I can find out the thickness of the film as a function of radial distance from centre under the assumption that the pressure is equal on the surface of the jet as it was in the incident jet [and thus using Bernoulli and conservation of mass], and I can work out the force on the plate due to the change in momentum of the jet normal to the plate.

You don't need to figure out the thickness of the film. You do need the force exerted on the plate, however, but that doesn't require you to know the thickness of the film.

I can also work out for a particular stagnation point above the centre of the plate, that the pressure [by Bernoulli] is P0 + 0.5pv0^2 where I've called the jet initial pressure P0, and initial velocity v0.

It's actually P0-0.5pv0^2. Bernoulli's law says that 0.5p v^2 + P =P0, where P0 is the pressure at a place where velocity is 0, so P=P0-0.5pv^2.

However both of these forces would act down on the plate, so that it was blasted away from the incident jet (as you'd expect in real life). I therefore can't think of any force which would act toward the jet, and so have no idea how to solve this problem.

The pressure acts upwards because on the other side of the plate, the pressure is higher.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top