1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Fluid Mechanics

  1. Oct 11, 2014 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data

    ?temp_hash=0cf574ea033b4856fe276bc9518d0c17.jpg

    2. Relevant equations


    3. The attempt at a solution

    Since the cylinder is in equilibrium ,net force and torque on it should be zero.

    I am not sure whether we are required to calculate force due to the two fluids as it seems to be a simple conceptual problem . I think I am missing some trick .

    I would be grateful if somebody could help me with the problem .
     

    Attached Files:

  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 11, 2014 #2

    haruspex

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    I don't think there is any trick - just do the integration. But which will you use, net zero force or net zero torque?
     
  4. Oct 11, 2014 #3

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Hint: Compute the horizontal component of force from the fluid on each side. (No integration needed--or at least a trivial one.)
     
  5. Oct 11, 2014 #4

    haruspex

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    I was trying not to give away that force is the way to go.
     
  6. Oct 11, 2014 #5

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Oops! Sorry about that! :s
     
  7. Oct 11, 2014 #6

    Orodruin

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    So the question I would like to ask OP now is if (s)he can argue for why force is the way to go and momentum equilibrium is automatic if force equilibrium is fulfilled.
     
  8. Oct 12, 2014 #7
    Thank you very much for your response :) .

    You are right that a trivial integration is required . This is precisely why I said in OP that I was missing some trick . Well... you were spot on as usual :D . Anyways I would still like to know how we can deal with no integration oo).

    I would like to discuss a couple of points .

    1) Suppose instead of having the convex surface towards the liquid ,it were some other arbitrary shape of same height h ,say a similar concave surface ,or an inclined surface(instead of a cylinder there was a wedge) , a straight vertical plane ( instead of a cylinder there was a cuboid ) , then too , the horizontal force of liquid would remain same in all these cases ??

    2) Another way to think about this is to find the projection of area exposed to liquid on a vertical plane and then to calculate the force due to liquid on this projected vertical area ??

    Do you agree ?
     
  9. Oct 12, 2014 #8

    haruspex

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    Yes on both.
    Do you see why analysis of torque leads to the same answer?
     
  10. Oct 12, 2014 #9
    Do you agree that apart from horizontal force ,vertical force by the fluid on all different shapes also remain same ?

    If yes ,then does that mean instead of a cylinder of radius 'r' and length 'l' ,it were a cuboidal shaped object having width '2r' , height '2r' and length 'l' , the force balance equations would remain same (i.e Pressure by the fluid would remain same) ??

    No
     
    Last edited: Oct 12, 2014
  11. Oct 12, 2014 #10

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Exactly correct.
     
  12. Oct 12, 2014 #11
    Thanks...

    And what is your opinion on post#9 ?
     
  13. Oct 12, 2014 #12
    Despite solving the problem I am a little unsure . The force dF exerted by fluid on a tiny surface element dA is radially towards the center (on the axis ) ,given by dF = PdA . Now we are looking for dFx i.e component of force in horizontal direction and for that we are multiplying P by dAx i.e component of area along YZ plane . Right ??

    Now when I compare this situation with that of calculating flux of a constant electric field across a hemispherical cap , the flux is given by E(##\pi r^2##). Here (##\pi r^2##) is the projection of the hemispherical surface along a plane perpendicular to the electric field .

    But in the former case P is a scalar quantity whereas E in the later case is vector .

    Are the two concepts similar or am I mixing up two unrelated concepts ?

    Sorry if I am not clear . But this is how I came up with the reasoning in this question .

    Kindly give your views .
     
  14. Oct 12, 2014 #13

    haruspex

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    The concepts are analogous. P is a scalar, but dA is a vector (perpendicular to the surface).
    If the small element length ds is at angle theta to the vertical, what horizontal force do you get from a pressure P?
    What torque do you get from the total force on ds about the point of contact of the drum with the base?
     
  15. Oct 12, 2014 #14

    ehild

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    The electric flux through an elementary surface is ##\vec E \cdot \vec {dA}##. ##\vec{dA}## is a vector, with magnitude equal to the area dA and direction perpendicular to the surface, and pointing "outward".

    In case of the cylinder in the fluid, you need the resultant force. The force exerted by the fluid on a small area on the surface of the cylinder is ##\vec {dF}=-P\vec {dA}##. You need the horizontal components, ##dF_x= -P\vec{dA}\cdot \hat x## .

    In both cases, you have the projection of the area onto a plane perpendicular to a certain direction.

    ehild
     
  16. Oct 12, 2014 #15
    If you try to change the surface you still have to find the relation between the force on curved surface and any other surface.So I think there is no way without integration.
     
  17. Oct 12, 2014 #16
    Hello ehild

    Thank you for the reply .

    Could you give response on post#9 ?
     
  18. Oct 13, 2014 #17

    ehild

    User Avatar
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    What do you mean by "vertical force by the fluid on all different shapes also remain same"?
    The buoyant force is equal to the weigh of the fluid displaced, for any shapes.

    ehild
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2014
  19. Oct 13, 2014 #18
    The force due to the right liquid comes out to be [itex] 3/2*rho*g*R^2*l [/itex](from integration).So we can see the pressure =[itex] 3/2*rho*g*R[/itex] and area = R*l. so i think we can conclude that surface to be a cuboid of dimensions [itex]R*R*l[/itex]
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2014
  20. Oct 14, 2014 #19

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Oops... forgot to respond. (But others have already responded.)

    No.

    As you realize, calculating the horizontal force involves a simple integration. But directly calculating the vertical force would involve a more challenging integration. Luckily, you can apply Archimedes' principle and avoid such troubles. Then you'll see that the vertical force depends on displaced volume.
     
  21. Oct 14, 2014 #20
    Just for fun, try calculating the moments on the barrier due to the fluid volumes. I'll be anxious to see how you do that.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Fluid Mechanics
  1. Fluid mechanics (Replies: 11)

  2. Fluid mechanics (Replies: 8)

  3. Fluid Mechanics (Replies: 1)

Loading...