Electric Flux Calculation for Oppositely Charged Circular Plates

  • Thread starter Thread starter xcvxcvvc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flux
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating electric flux between two oppositely charged circular plates with a charge of ±1.0 nC, a radius of 5.00 cm, and a separation of 1.00 mm. Participants express confusion about applying Gauss's Law, noting that it typically involves closed surfaces, while this scenario involves an open surface. The definition of electric flux is crucial for understanding the problem, as it relates to the electric field and the area through which it passes. Additionally, it is suggested that the electric flux for a larger radius of 5.00 meters would yield similar results due to the uniformity of the electric field between the plates. Understanding these principles is essential for solving the homework problem effectively.
xcvxcvvc
Messages
392
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two circular parallel metal plates are oppositely charged with q = ±1.0 nC. The two plates each have a radius of 5.00 cm and are separated by 1.00 mm. (a) Estimate the electric flux for a circular area of radius 5.00 cm sandwiched between the two plates. (b) Repeat for a circular area of radius 5.00 meters – the result would be essentially the same. Explain why this would be the case.

I don't know how to start. I thought that any charge outside a gauss surface is zero to that surface.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This isn't really a Gauss's Law problem. Gauss's Law deals with flux through closed surfaces. Here, we have an open surface.

HINT: Let's start at the beginning. Can you state the definition of electric flux for me?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top