Flux through a square and rectangle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on calculating the flux of vector fields through specified surfaces using surface integrals. The first calculation involves the vector v1 = (1, 3, 5) through a 2×2 square in the x-z plane, yielding a flux of 20. The second calculation involves the vector v2 = (z, y, -x) through a rectangle defined by 0 ≤ x ≤ 3 and 0 ≤ y ≤ 2, resulting in a flux of -5/2. The negative flux in the second calculation is attributed to the orientation of the normal vector, which is crucial for accurate flux evaluation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector fields and flux concepts
  • Familiarity with surface integrals in multivariable calculus
  • Knowledge of normal vectors and their significance in flux calculations
  • Ability to perform double integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of surface integrals in vector calculus
  • Learn about the divergence theorem and its applications
  • Practice calculating flux through various surfaces using different vector fields
  • Explore the implications of normal vector orientation on flux results
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with vector calculus and need to understand flux calculations through surfaces.

bowlbase
Messages
145
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Flux:
a. Calculate the flux of the vector v1 = (1, 3 5) through a 2×2 square in the x-z plane (i.e., y = 0).
b. Calculate the flux of the vector v2=(z, y, -x) through this rectangle:0≤ x ≤3, 0≤ y ≤ 2, z = 0..


The Attempt at a Solution


I guess flux is suppose to be some kind of surface integral though I don't recall doing these in calculus before. That's not to say I didn't.. but I simply don't remember them. I've looked up the integral methods and this is what I got:
A. \int \vec{v_1}da
z=0, da=dxdy\hat{z}
\int^2_0 5 dxdy = 5(2)(2)=20

B. \int \vec{v_3}da
again z=0, da=dxdy\hat{z}
\int -x dxdy
\int^3_0 -x dx= -9/2
\int^2_0 dy=2
=-5/2

First thing that strikes me is the negative in B. I don't think that I should have a negative flux if I'm understanding this right. Can anyone help me understand this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi bowlbase! :smile:
bowlbase said:
First thing that strikes me is the negative in B. I don't think that I should have a negative flux if I'm understanding this right. Can anyone help me understand this?

it depends whether you regard the normal as being in the positive or negative z direction

since the question doesn't say, it doesn't matter :wink:
a. Calculate the flux of the vector v1 = (1, 3 5) through a 2×2 square in the x-z plane (i.e., y = 0).

The Attempt at a Solution


I guess flux is suppose to be some kind of surface integral though I don't recall doing these in calculus before. That's not to say I didn't.. but I simply don't remember them. I've looked up the integral methods and this is what I got:
A. \int \vec{v_1}da
z=0, da=dxdy\hat{z}
\int^2_0 5 dxdy = 5(2)(2)=20

correct method, but
i] you've misread the question … the normal is in the y direction!
ii] please always write ∫∫ not ∫ for a double integral, and you're less likely to make mistake :wink:
b. Calculate the flux of the vector v2=(z, y, -x) through this rectangle:0≤ x ≤3, 0≤ y ≤ 2, z = 0..

B. \int \vec{v_3}da
again z=0, da=dxdy\hat{z}
\int -x dxdy
\int^3_0 -x dx= -9/2
\int^2_0 dy=2
=-5/2

no, you seem to have evaluated ∫∫ xdxdy as a sum of two integrals

you need to integrate wrt x first, then integrate that result wrt y
 
A) its funny that I have done it correctly on paper but incorrectly here. I'm not paying enough attention I guess.

B) no idea why I added those. I'm glad that I at least had the correct idea.

thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K