Force and Pulley Problem (Pic Included)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the tensions in a pulley system with a mass M, where the pulleys are massless and frictionless. The user initially deduces that FT1 equals mg/2 due to the force being split, and calculates FT4 as 3mg/2 based on the sum of tensions. However, a more accurate method is suggested, emphasizing the analysis of forces on the pulleys rather than simply halving the force. The correct relationships are established through equilibrium considerations, leading to the conclusion that FT2 and FT3 are equal, and the tensions can be derived systematically. Overall, the user confirms their answers are correct but appreciates the clarification on the proper approach to solving pulley problems.
Dcarroll
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A mass M is held in place by an applied force , FA , and the pulley system shown in the figure below. The pulleys are massless and frictionless. Express the tension in each section of the rope, FT1, FT2, FT3, FT4, and FT5, as well as the applied force, FA , in terms of M and g.

Here is a picture I found online:

20091241533396339553761961045582927.jpg


Homework Equations


F=ma


The Attempt at a Solution


I looked at the picture and saw that the force being applied by mass M was split in half because of the strings separating. I then came to conclusion that FT1 must be FT1=mg/2, because the force of mass M was cut in half(I think this is correct).

I then looked at FT4 and knew that it was the addition of FT1+FT5. The masses force was split in half like i said earlier, so now FT2+FT3+FT1=FT4. mg/2+mg/2+mg/2= 3mg/2. So the force on FT4 is 3mg/2 (I think this is the correct answer).

FT5 is just the force of mass M pulling down, so FT5=mg

To wrap it all up these are my answers:
FT1=mg/2
FT2=mg/2
FT3=mg/2
FT4=3mg/2
FT5=mg
FA=FT1=mg/2

I just want to see if my thought process is right on these and if my answers are correct. We have not gotten into pulleys yet so it was somewhat of an educated guess.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Dcarroll! :smile:
Dcarroll said:
I looked at the picture and saw that the force being applied by mass M was split in half because of the strings separating. I then came to conclusion that FT1 must be FT1=mg/2, because the force of mass M was cut in half(I think this is correct).

I then looked at FT4 and knew that it was the addition of FT1+FT5. The masses force was split in half like i said earlier, so now FT2+FT3+FT1=FT4. mg/2+mg/2+mg/2= 3mg/2. So the force on FT4 is 3mg/2 (I think this is the correct answer).

FT5 is just the force of mass M pulling down, so FT5=mg

To wrap it all up these are my answers:
FT1=mg/2
FT2=mg/2
FT3=mg/2
FT4=3mg/2
FT5=mg
FA=FT1=mg/2

Yes, they're all correct. :smile:

But I don't like your "cut in half" argument …

the correct method is to say "consider the forces on the small (masless) pulley" … they are T2 + T3 up, and T5 down; and T2 = T3, and the acceleration is zero, so 2T3 - T5 = 0

similarly, consider the forces on the large pulley, and the forces on the mass M :wink:
 
Ahh ok thanks a bunch, like i said if never done pulleys so the correct way to do things helps lol
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top