Force and Pulley Problem (Pic Included)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the tensions in a pulley system involving a mass M and an applied force FA. The user initially proposed that the tensions FT1, FT2, FT3, FT4, and FT5 could be expressed as FT1=mg/2, FT2=mg/2, FT3=mg/2, FT4=3mg/2, and FT5=mg, based on the assumption that the force was split in half. However, a more accurate approach involves analyzing the forces on the massless pulleys, leading to the conclusion that T2 = T3 and the relationship 2T3 - T5 = 0 must be applied. The final confirmations indicate that the user's answers were correct, but the reasoning needed refinement.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's second law (F=ma)
  • Basic knowledge of pulley systems and tension forces
  • Familiarity with massless and frictionless assumptions in physics
  • Ability to analyze forces acting on objects in equilibrium
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of tension in pulley systems
  • Learn how to analyze forces on massless pulleys
  • Explore the concept of equilibrium in static systems
  • Review examples of complex pulley systems and their calculations
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and pulley systems, as well as educators looking for examples of tension calculations in real-world applications.

Dcarroll
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A mass M is held in place by an applied force , FA , and the pulley system shown in the figure below. The pulleys are massless and frictionless. Express the tension in each section of the rope, FT1, FT2, FT3, FT4, and FT5, as well as the applied force, FA , in terms of M and g.

Here is a picture I found online:

20091241533396339553761961045582927.jpg


Homework Equations


F=ma


The Attempt at a Solution


I looked at the picture and saw that the force being applied by mass M was split in half because of the strings separating. I then came to conclusion that FT1 must be FT1=mg/2, because the force of mass M was cut in half(I think this is correct).

I then looked at FT4 and knew that it was the addition of FT1+FT5. The masses force was split in half like i said earlier, so now FT2+FT3+FT1=FT4. mg/2+mg/2+mg/2= 3mg/2. So the force on FT4 is 3mg/2 (I think this is the correct answer).

FT5 is just the force of mass M pulling down, so FT5=mg

To wrap it all up these are my answers:
FT1=mg/2
FT2=mg/2
FT3=mg/2
FT4=3mg/2
FT5=mg
FA=FT1=mg/2

I just want to see if my thought process is right on these and if my answers are correct. We have not gotten into pulleys yet so it was somewhat of an educated guess.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Dcarroll! :smile:
Dcarroll said:
I looked at the picture and saw that the force being applied by mass M was split in half because of the strings separating. I then came to conclusion that FT1 must be FT1=mg/2, because the force of mass M was cut in half(I think this is correct).

I then looked at FT4 and knew that it was the addition of FT1+FT5. The masses force was split in half like i said earlier, so now FT2+FT3+FT1=FT4. mg/2+mg/2+mg/2= 3mg/2. So the force on FT4 is 3mg/2 (I think this is the correct answer).

FT5 is just the force of mass M pulling down, so FT5=mg

To wrap it all up these are my answers:
FT1=mg/2
FT2=mg/2
FT3=mg/2
FT4=3mg/2
FT5=mg
FA=FT1=mg/2

Yes, they're all correct. :smile:

But I don't like your "cut in half" argument …

the correct method is to say "consider the forces on the small (masless) pulley" … they are T2 + T3 up, and T5 down; and T2 = T3, and the acceleration is zero, so 2T3 - T5 = 0

similarly, consider the forces on the large pulley, and the forces on the mass M :wink:
 
Ahh ok thanks a bunch, like i said if never done pulleys so the correct way to do things helps lol
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
891
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
12K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K