Work Done on a Book: 14 J or 42 J?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating work done on a book in two scenarios: lifting it to a shelf and sliding it under a bookcase. The correct work done when lifting the book is 14 J, calculated using the formula W = Fd with a force of 7 N over a distance of 2 m. When sliding the book, the effective force after accounting for friction is 3 N, leading to a work done of 9 J over a distance of 3 m. The confusion arises from incorrectly attempting to apply the work from the first scenario to the second, which is not valid since different forces and actions are involved. Ultimately, the net force results in the book moving with acceleration, contributing to its kinetic energy.
mystry4
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Am I doing this correctly?
If a book that weighs 7 N is picked up off the floor and put on a shelf 2 m high, the work done on the book would be W = Fd (7N)(2m) = 14 J

If the same 7 N book is slid under the bookcase 3 m away, with a pushing force of 5 N and a frictional opposing force of 2 N, then the work done is

F = F(push) - f(friction) = 5 N - 2 N = 3 N then W = Fd (3N)(3m) = 9 J OR
should I be taking the 14 J from the first part and using
W = Fd = (14 J)(3m) = 42 J
Thank you for your help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Work = Force_applied * distance. Your first attempt at the second question is close, the second is way off. First of all, why would you be using the number from the previous question? In the first one, you're lifting a book, and in this one, you're pushing it. Second of all, 14 J is a measure of work, so how could you use that as your value for force? And why would 14 J x 3 m = 42 J? Look at the units.
 
So, W = Force applied x distance would be 5N(the push) x 3 m = 8J.
The 2N of frictional force is one of those informational numbers and not
one used in the formula?
 
Yes, but 5 x 3 is not 8.
 
Hmm... THAT is what I get for trying to do too many things at once! Of course, 5 x 3 = 15, geez...I need a vacation!
 
Notice that since the applied force (5 N) is greater than the friction force (2 N), the book will not just "slide" under the desk. There will be 2 N "net" force on it which will result in an acceleration. The book will wind up under the desk, not stopped but with a net speed (and so kinetic energy). That's where that additional 9 Joules goes.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top