Force applied on suspending/falling mass

AI Thread Summary
A falling rod subjected to a horizontal force at one end will experience torque, with the axis of rotation determined by the specific conditions rather than being fixed at the center of mass. For a non-hinged body like a flipping car, the axis of rotation does not always pass through the center of gravity, and identifying the correct axis requires analysis of the forces and moments acting on the body. The net torque about any axis is independent of other axes, allowing for calculations of net rotation over time. The relationship between torque, moment of inertia, and angular acceleration is analogous to linear motion equations. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing rotational dynamics effectively.
jakesee
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi,

May I ask, if there is a sufficiently long rod falling vertically downwards due to gravity, and then at an instance, a horizontal force is applied at one end of the rod, will this force create a torque on the rod? If so, where is the axis of rotation?

Second question, if a body, not hinged, is experiencing rotation, e.g. a flipping car in "mid air" in a collision, does the axis of rotation ALWAYS go through its center of gravity. If not, how do we find out which axis?.

Third question, say, in the flipping car example, is the "Net Torque" about any axis independant of any other axis? Is there a method to calculate the "net rotation about net axis" so that we can integrate over time to get the resultant orientation? Similar to integrating velocity vector to get position vector kind of maths?


Sorry, that's aquite abit. Hope I can get some help. Thanks for helping.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi jakesee! :smile:

Yes, if there's a torque (a moment) about the centre of mass, then the body will rotate.

The position of the axis of rotation depends on the exact figures (it won't usually be the centre of mass).

The total angle of rotation doesn't depend on the axis. You can get the dynamics from torque = moment of inertia times angular acceleration, just like the linear F = ma.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instant_centre_of_rotation" for some details. :wink:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the replies, I'll be reading the suggested topics a while before coming back. thanks thanks. =)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top