Force exerted by a magnetic field

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the magnetic field B exerted on a wire carrying a current in different orientations. The force on the wire is given as -0.20N i + 0.20N j when parallel to the z-axis and 0.20N k when parallel to the x-axis. Participants clarify that the equation F = I(L x B) should involve the cross product, not a dot product. By analyzing the components of the wire's length L and the forces, it becomes easier to derive equations for the components of B. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment that understanding the cross product simplifies the problem-solving process.
apt8
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a 10cm long straight wire is parallel with the z axis and carries a current of 4.0A in the +z direction. The force on this wire due to a uniform magnetic field B is -0.20N i+0.20N j. If this wire is rotated so that it is parallel with the x-axis with the current in the +x direction, the force on the wire becomes 0.20N k. Find B.


Homework Equations


F=I(LxB)

The Attempt at a Solution


I rearranged the equation so B=F/(IxL). I plugged all of the numbers in but I don't understand how to do the dot product if I is not a vector. Can I use some kind of dot product between F and L?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
apt8 said:
I rearranged the equation so B=F/(IxL). I plugged all of the numbers in but I don't understand how to do the dot product if I is not a vector. Can I use some kind of dot product between F and L?

I think you mean cross product, but anyway...

I think you can solve this problem by getting more detailed with what the cross product actually is.

One of the equations you've listed is

\vec F=I(\vec L \times \vec B).

Being more explicit with the cross product, this is the same thing as:

\vec F = I\left( \left| <br /> \begin{tabular}{ l c r }<br /> i &amp; j &amp; k \\<br /> L_x &amp; L_y &amp; L_z \\<br /> B_x &amp; B_y &amp; B_z \\<br /> \end{tabular}<br /> \right| \right)

where the thing inside of the parenthesis represents the determinant of the matrix.

What makes this problem a lot easier, is that some of the L components are zero in the first case, and other components are zero in the second case. So even though it looks ugly now, it's actually pretty easy to generate a few equations to solve for Bx, By, and Bz.
 
Yes I did mean the cross product. Thank you very much this helped a lot!
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top