Force exerted by a stick on its axle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EstimatedEyes
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axle Force
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the vertical component of the force exerted by a stick on its axle when it is in a vertical position. The stick has a mass of 8.6 kg and a length of 0.7 m, pivoted at a point 0.24 m from one end. The user correctly calculated the angular velocity as 6.38 rad/s and determined the center of mass's position relative to the axis of rotation. However, they encountered an error in calculating the centripetal force, which should be derived from the formula mv²/r. The community suggests re-evaluating the calculations, particularly ensuring the speed is squared in the centripetal force equation.
EstimatedEyes
Messages
31
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A stick of uniform density with mass M = 8.6 kg and length L = 0.7 m is pivoted about an axle which is perpendicular to its length and located 0.24 m from one end. Ignore any friction between the stick and the axle. What is the magnitude of the vertical component of the force exerted by the stick on the axle when the stick passes through the vertical?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I already correctly calculated that the angular velocity when it is in the vertical position is 6.38 rad/s and that the center of mass is .11m below the axis of rotation when it is in the vertical position. From this I calculated v of the center of mass by multiplying the angular velocity to the radius. Once I got this answer I calculated the centripetal force by v^2/r and then added it to mg. This answer is not right, but I don't know where I went wrong. I'm sure it's something really simple. Thanks in advance for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The (net) centripetal force is mv2/r. Assuming that you did not forget to multiply by the mass, your method is correct. Redo the numbers - you may have forgotten to, say, square the speed.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top