Force in relation to angular momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the force required to pull a dumbbell in while sitting on a spinning stool, focusing on the relationship between angular momentum and kinetic energy. The initial angular velocity is 3 rad/sec, which increases to 48 rad/sec as the radius decreases from 80 cm to 20 cm. The initial and final kinetic energies are calculated as 11.52 J and 184.32 J, respectively, indicating a significant increase in kinetic energy. The change in kinetic energy is linked to the work done against radial inertial forces while moving the dumbbell. The forum participants explore various equations and methods, including torque and energy work, to derive the necessary force for this motion.
valvan1
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



so a student is sitting on a spinning stool and has a 2kg dumbbell in each hand angular velocity is 3rad/sec arms stretched out is a radius of 80cm and he pulls in his arms to 20cm. for this problem your ignoring the students weight.

from other problems i have figured out
so angular velocity to start with is 3 rad/sec
angular velocity final is 48 rad/sec

kinetic energy initial is 11.52( don't know what this dimensions is so I am guessing J)
kinetic energy final is 184.32
angular momentum = 7.68

and i need to find the force required to pull one of the dumbbells in at a constant speed is equal to F=((initial angular momentum of 1 block)^2)/(4*Mass of one weight*Radius^3))

Homework Equations


I=\summr^2
k=1/2I\omega^2
T=I\alpha
L=I\omega

The Attempt at a Solution


do i say Torque=F*d and Torque=I*alpha and then go Force = Ia/d? or is there another way to solve this that I am not seeing ?
or do i use the change in kinetic energy equation 1/2*I*\omega^2Final-1/2*I*\omega^2initial = F*d
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I would think the change in kinetic energy would be equal to the work done in moving the dumbell from 80cm to 20 cm.
 
Yes, KE would increase when moved from 80cm to 20cm. It would increase 16 times!

The KE is gained at the expense of work done overcoming the radial inertial force (m * w^2 * r) along a distance 60 cms. w = angular velocity. As the dumbell is moving from 80 to 20, the angular velocity increases to satisfy the angular momentum conservation. So "w" at any radial distance is given by w(r) = w(R) * (R/r)^2

where w(R) is the angular velocity at radius R. If we put this inertial force and work done in moving infinitesimal distance "dr" then we get a definite integral that gives the work done to increase the KE from bringing the dumbell from 80cms to 20cms
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: Find Electric field due to charges between 2 parallel infinite planes using Gauss law at any point Here's the diagram. We have a uniform p (rho) density of charges between 2 infinite planes in the cartesian coordinates system. I used a cube of thickness a that spans from z=-a/2 to z=a/2 as a Gaussian surface, each side of the cube has area A. I know that the field depends only on z since there is translational invariance in x and y directions because the planes are...
Back
Top