Force in spring due to falling object

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the force exerted by a falling object attached to a crane via a non-elastic cable and modeled as a spring system. The user presents a formula derived from energy conservation, equating potential energy from height and spring extension. Clarifications are sought regarding the relationship between the height of the fall and the spring's extension, particularly when considering deceleration effects. It is noted that if the force from the spring is significantly greater than the weight of the object, the additional height during deceleration can be neglected. However, if it cannot be neglected, a quadratic equation must be solved to account for the relationship between the height and the spring extension.
ChristopherJ
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm designing a crane that is supposed to withstand forces due to a falling object attached to the crane with a non-elastic cable. I have some troubles to calculate what force that will be due to the falling object.

I figured that one way is to simplify this system with a spring with spring constant k, extension of the spring x, non-elastic cable of length h, object with mass m, gravitational constant g.

Then, the spring is hanging vertical, attached in the upper end to a rigid mount and the cable in the free hanging end, and in the free end of the cable the object is attached. If the object is falling from the point where the cable is attached to the spring it will fall the distance h. Then the following expressions may be used.

1. Potential energy due to a height, E=mgh
2. Potential energy in the spring due to an extension, E=0.5kx^2
3. Hooke´s law due to an extension, F=kx

1 and 2 gives mgh=0.5kx^2 which gives x=sqrt(2mgh/k). This combined with 3 gives F=kx=sqrt(2mgkh).

Am I right in my reasoning and the last expression? For which cases is this then true?

I would be most grateful for response.

Regards
Christopher
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The formula is good if you can neglect the additional height difference during the deceleration process. You can neglect it if F>>mg.
 
Okey, so you mean that h in mgh is the length of the cable plus x, i.e. h ist the distance from the point of release to where it comes to a stop? If I can't neglect that, how should I do the calculations then? Since x depends on h, which depends in x?
 
Last edited:
If I can't neglect that, how should I do the calculations then? Since x depends on h, which depends in x?
You will get a quadratic equation, which can be solved. The "new h" is just the old h (constant) plus x.
 
mfb said:
You will get a quadratic equation, which can be solved. The "new h" is just the old h (constant) plus x.

I'm not sure I'm following. If the new h is the old h plus x, then I can perform the calculations twice and the second time just add x to h? Or how would the equation look like?
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top