Force of gravity on one object caused by four objects

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the net gravitational force on a central sphere (m5) caused by four surrounding spheres (m1, m2, m3, m4) positioned at the corners of a square. Participants clarify that the distance from the center to the corners is s/√2, leading to the correct application of the gravitational force formula. It was noted that using sin(45) and cos(45) directly may not be recognized by the WebAssign program, suggesting a need for substitution with √2 for accurate results. The final resolution involved adjusting the trigonometric functions to ensure compatibility with the program's requirements. The conversation emphasizes the importance of precise calculations in gravitational force problems.
drdude24
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
1. A square of edge length s is formed by four spheres of masses, m1, m2, m3, and m4. What is the x-component and the y-component of the net gravitational force from them on a central sphere of mass m5. State your answers in terms of the given variables. (Use any variable or symbol stated above along with the following as necessary: and G for the gravitational constant.)

In the problem y is given positive direction up, x is positive right.
m1 - +y,-x (top left corner); m2 - +y,+x (top right); m3 - -y,-x (bot left); m4 - -y,+x (bot right)




2. The force of gravity between two objects equation: Fgrav = (G*M*m)/r^2



3. I would assume due to it being a square, the radius between the center and the corner squared (r^2) would equal (s^2)/2 and the angle we're using is 45 degrees. That being said it should be the Fgrav * sin(45) for y component and Fgrav * cos(45) for x comp. so it should look like:
Fx = (2Gm5cos(45))/(s^2) * (m2+m4-m1-m3)
Fy = (2Gm5sin(45))/(s^2) * (m1+m2-m3-m4)

I've worked it and reworked it thinking perhaps I missed something in the simplification process but no good. WebAssign (the computer program) says that it is wrong. Please help, my two roommates, one neighbor, and I all worked independently and got the same answer. The only other thing I thought of was maybe the radius of the spheres but that information is not given.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your answer looks correct. How smart is WebAssign at figuring out whether two algebraic expressions are equivalent? Are you actually entering "sin(45)"? Might it expect radians? Would putting √2 instead of 2 sin(45) help?
 
drdude24 said:
1. A square of edge length s is formed by four spheres of masses, m1, m2, m3, and m4. What is the x-component and the y-component of the net gravitational force from them on a central sphere of mass m5. State your answers in terms of the given variables. (Use any variable or symbol stated above along with the following as necessary: and G for the gravitational constant.)

In the problem y is given positive direction up, x is positive right.
m1 - +y,-x (top left corner); m2 - +y,+x (top right); m3 - -y,-x (bot left); m4 - -y,+x (bot right)
Those coordinates don't make any sense.

You mean that m1 is at coordinate (x,y)=(-1,1)s/2 etc so that the square has sides length s and is centered on the origin?
2. The force of gravity between two objects equation: Fgrav = (G*M*m)/r^2

3. I would assume due to it being a square, the radius between the center and the corner squared (r^2) would equal (s^2)/2 and the angle we're using is 45 degrees.
Why "assume"? Didn't you work it out? i.e. using a sketch of the situation ... the distance from center to any corner forms the hypotenuse of a 1-1-√2 triangle where the other sides have length s/2 ... therefore the distance is s/√2 and r2=s2/2 ... no "assume"ing needed.

That being said it should be the Fgrav * sin(45) for y component and Fgrav * cos(45) for x comp. so it should look like:
Fx = (2Gm5cos(45))/(s^2) * (m2+m4-m1-m3)
Fy = (2Gm5sin(45))/(s^2) * (m1+m2-m3-m4)

I've worked it and reworked it thinking perhaps I missed something in the simplification process but no good. WebAssign (the computer program) says that it is wrong. Please help, my two roommates, one neighbor, and I all worked independently and got the same answer. The only other thing I thought of was maybe the radius of the spheres but that information is not given.
OK - so your trouble is with directions.

You don't need to resolve the forces into x and y components -
If you wanted to "brute force" it so the numbers come out automagically without much thought, then use: $$\vec{F}=\frac{Gm_1m_2}{|\vec{r}|^3}\vec{r}$$

But since the geometry is simple you know how it will come out...
just write out the magnitude of the force multiplied by a unit vector pointing in the direction of the force.

note: cos45 = sin45 = 1/√2
the unit vector pointing to the mass at position (1,1)s/2 is ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(\hat{\imath}+\hat{\jmath})##

you have another shortcut in that two of the forces are opposite direction to the other two.
 
Resolved it

Turns out that it was the sin(45) and cos(45). The program I'm guessing didn't register it as 45 degrees.

By substituting 2sin(45) and 2cos(45) for √2 everything worked out.

Thanks for the advice guys!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top