Force of parallel plate capacitor

AI Thread Summary
A parallel-plate capacitor with a plate area of 0.3 m² and a separation of 0.1 mm has a charge of 5 x 10^-6 C on each plate. The electric field (E) was calculated using the formula E = Q/(εA), yielding a value of approximately 1.67 x 10^6 V/m. The force (F) exerted by one plate on the other was determined using F = qE, resulting in a force of about 4.71 N after correcting the permittivity constant to 8.85 x 10^-12 F/m. The discussion emphasized the importance of accurately calculating the electric field and force in parallel-plate capacitors. The final calculated force of 4.71 N is considered accurate.
rgold
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A parallel-plate capacitor has a plate area of .3m^2 and a plate separation of .1mm. If the charge on ech plate has a magnitude of 5*10^-6C then the force exerted by one plate on the other has what magnitude

Homework Equations


Q=E Ԑ A
F=qE

The Attempt at a Solution


so to solve for E i used the first equation: 5*10^-6C=E*(10^-11)(.2) and got E=1.67*10^6 V/m
First i want to make sure that i am moving in the right direction and also do i use 5*10^-6C as my q in the second equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
U= (Q^2)/(2c) = (Q^2)/(2ԐA) d and F=(dU)/(dd) = (-Q^2)/ (2ԐA)?
so F= (5*10^-6C)^2/(2 * 10^-11 *.3)?

is the answer then 4N?
 
Your approximation for the value of ##\epsilon_o## is very crude. A good value would be ##\epsilon_o = 8.854 \times 10^{-12}~ F/m##, but even ##9 \times 10^{-12}~F/m## would be better.

The appropriate approach to this problem is to find the electric field due to a single charged plate and then determine the force that it exerts on the charge of the other plate. Note that between the plates of a parallel plate capacitor the net field is due to the contribution of the fields from both plates; each plate contributes half the total field.
rgold said:
so to solve for E i used the first equation: 5*10^-6C=E*(10^-11)(.2) and got E=1.67*10^6 V/m
What does the "(.2)" value represent?
 
gneill said:
Your approximation for the value of ##\epsilon_o## is very crude. A good value would be ##\epsilon_o = 8.854 \times 10^{-12}~ F/m##, but even ##9 \times 10^{-12}~F/m## would be better.

The appropriate approach to this problem is to find the electric field due to a single charged plate and then determine the force that it exerts on the charge of the other plate. Note that between the plates of a parallel plate capacitor the net field is due to the contribution of the fields from both plates; each plate contributes half the total field.

What does the "(.2)" value represent?

that was a typo i meant to write .3 m^2. ok i used the 8.85*10^-12 and got 4.71N is this more accurate
 
rgold said:
that was a typo i meant to write .3 m^2. ok i used the 8.85*10^-12 and got 4.71N is this more accurate
That would be a good answer :smile:
 
gneill said:
That would be a good answer :smile:
thank you very much!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top