Force of repulsion between two hemispheres of a metal conductor

In summary, the question asked for the force of repulsion between the northern and southern hemispheres of a metal sphere with a total charge. Two different approaches were proposed, one using integration and the other using surface charge density. After further discussion, it was determined that both approaches lead to the same result, with the integration approach accounting for the net force on the entire hemisphere while the surface charge density approach taking into account the force at every point on the hemisphere. The equation \vec{f}=\frac{\sigma^2}{2\epsilon_0}n was derived from Griffiths' 3rd edition of "Introduction to electrodynamics" and was used to calculate the force on each point of the hemisphere in the z
  • #1
ELB27
117
15

Homework Statement


A metal sphere of radius ##R## carries a total charge ##Q##. What is the force of repulsion between the "northern" hemisphere and the "southern" hemisphere?

Homework Equations


The force per unit area on the surface of a conductor:
[tex]\vec{f} = \frac{1}{2\epsilon_0}\sigma^2\hat{n}[/tex]
where ##\hat{n}## is the unit vector perpendicular to the surface.
Electrostatic pressure (if I understand it right - just the magnitude of the force per unit area expressed in terms of ##E## just outside the surface):
[tex]P = \frac{\epsilon_0}{2}E^2[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


Since it's a sphere the charge will be evenly distributed, thus the surface charge density is: [tex]\sigma = \frac{Q}{4\pi R^2}[/tex] Substituting into the equation for the force per unit area:
[tex]\vec{f} = \frac{Q^2}{32\epsilon_0\pi^2R^4}\hat{r}[/tex] Now to find the force only on one hemisphere I multiply by the surface area of it: [tex]\vec{F} = \vec{f}2\pi R^2 = \frac{Q^2}{16\epsilon_0\pi R^2}\hat{r}[/tex] This approach sounds logical to me, but after searching through google to check my answer (including this forum - it was asked 3 times) I find 2 different approaches. One is the same as mine but another one asserts that the above result for ##\vec{F}## needs to be integrated over the hemisphere and take the ##z## component only. (see this and this ; My approach is suggested here)
While the integration approach seems to dominate (2 out of 3 results in this forum) I don't see why the need for it. My only thought is that if I take the hemisphere as a whole, the x and y components cancel, but I don't understand why my approach doesn't account for that.
I would appreciate if someone can elaborate on this.
Thanks in advance!

Edit: I think I know what's the problem. The question is asking for the force acting on the hemisphere as a whole. In this case the net force will be in the z direction and I need to integrate the z component of the result above. However, I found the repulsion force at every point on the hemisphere. Any thoughts on this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
A ##\hat n## turned into a ##\hat r## ... how did you do that?

I agree - the question wants the net force between the hemispheres.
The repulsion at every point on the hemisphere is like air pressure on a parachute - each surface element is pushed away from the center, that's why the charge distribution is uniform. Summed over a single hemisphere, the (cylindrical) radial components cancel, leaving the axial components.

Have you considered a brute force approach - starting with a charge element on the north hemisphere and working out the force on it due to each charge element on the southern hemisphere, then adding all those forces up ... i.e. integrating over the surface of the southern hemisphere. Then you ca integrate over the surface of the northern hemisphere to get the net force on the north due to the south?
 
  • #3
Simon Bridge said:
A ##\hat n## turned into a ##\hat r## ... how did you do that?

I agree - the question wants the net force between the hemispheres.
The repulsion at every point on the hemisphere is like air pressure on a parachute - each surface element is pushed away from the center, that's why the charge distribution is uniform. Summed over a single hemisphere, the (cylindrical) radial components cancel, leaving the axial components.

Have you considered a brute force approach - starting with a charge element on the north hemisphere and working out the force on it due to each charge element on the southern hemisphere, then adding all those forces up ... i.e. integrating over the surface of the southern hemisphere. Then you ca integrate over the surface of the northern hemisphere to get the net force on the north due to the south?
Thank you for your reply. ##\hat{n}## is the unit normal vector to the surface charge. In the case of a sphere centered at the origin, ##\hat{r}## is playing this role for every point on the sphere. As for the problem itself, to find the net z-force I think that all that's required now is to take the z-component of my result:
[tex]\vec{f}_z = \frac{Q^2}{32\epsilon_0\pi^2 R^4}\cos\theta\hat{z}[/tex]
...and integrate over northern hemisphere:
[tex]\vec{F} = \hat{z}\int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^{\pi/2} \frac{Q^2}{32\epsilon_0\pi^2 R^4}\cos\theta\sin\theta d\theta d\phi = \frac{Q^2}{32\epsilon_0\pi^2 R^4}\frac{1}{2}2\pi \hat{z} = \frac{Q^2}{32\epsilon_0\pi R^2}\hat{z}[/tex]

This is also the result I get from the brute-force method and what the other people I quoted seem to get. Looks like that's it (still, that's a weird problem in my opinion).
Thanks again!
 
  • #4
Can i ask how one derives the equation [itex]\vec{f}=\frac{\sigma^2}{2\epsilon_0}n[/itex]
 
  • #5
Delta² said:
Can i ask how one derives the equation [itex]\vec{f}=\frac{\sigma^2}{2\epsilon_0}n[/itex]
There is a derivation of this equation quoted from Griffiths' 3rd edition of "Introduction to electrodynamics" http://physicspages.com/2011/10/31/electrostatic-pressure/.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #6
So long as you are sure you've accounted for how each surface element contributes a different amount to the z-component. I haven't checked myself - it's your work after all.
 
  • #7
Simon Bridge said:
So long as you are sure you've accounted for how each surface element contributes a different amount to the z-component. I haven't checked myself - it's your work after all.
The ##\cos\theta## accounts for that as far as I understand - the force that I found in the OP is constant and is the force that acts on every point on the hemisphere in the ##\hat{r} ## direction. To find the contribution of each point in the Z direction I multiply by ##\cos\theta## and integrate. Sounds logical to me - the force in the r direction is constant but the Z component is not because of different angle with the vertical.
 
  • #8
I ve looked at that link, i am not sure but i think some of the force you calculated in the z direction, is due to some parts of the northern hemisphere affecting other parts of the same hemisphere. Because in the exrpession for the force per unit area, if i udnerstand correctly, it is the force that is exerted on an infinetsimal area, by the rest surface area of the conductor, not only by the southern hemisphere.
 
  • #9
Ah ok i see now my mistake, due to Newton's 3rd law, the total force a hemishpere exerts to itself is always zero.
 

1. What is the force of repulsion between two hemispheres of a metal conductor?

The force of repulsion between two hemispheres of a metal conductor is the electrostatic force that occurs when two charged objects with the same charge come into close proximity. This force is caused by the repulsion between the like charges and is dependent on the amount of charge on each hemisphere and the distance between them.

2. How is the force of repulsion between two hemispheres of a metal conductor calculated?

The force of repulsion between two hemispheres of a metal conductor can be calculated using Coulomb's law, which states that the force between two charged objects is directly proportional to the product of their charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.

3. What factors affect the force of repulsion between two hemispheres of a metal conductor?

The force of repulsion between two hemispheres of a metal conductor is affected by the amount of charge on each hemisphere, the distance between them, and the dielectric constant of the medium between them. It is also affected by any intervening materials or objects that may alter the electric field between the two hemispheres.

4. Can the force of repulsion between two hemispheres of a metal conductor be measured?

Yes, the force of repulsion between two hemispheres of a metal conductor can be measured using specialized equipment such as a Coulomb balance or a torsion balance. These devices use the principles of Coulomb's law to measure the force between two charged objects and can provide accurate measurements of the force of repulsion between two hemispheres of a metal conductor.

5. How is the force of repulsion between two hemispheres of a metal conductor related to the concept of electric charge?

The force of repulsion between two hemispheres of a metal conductor is directly related to the concept of electric charge. The force is caused by the repulsion of like charges, and the magnitude of the force is determined by the amount of charge on each hemisphere. This concept is central to understanding the behavior of electrically charged objects and their interactions with one another.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
21
Views
667
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
350
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
205
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
821
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
404
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
220
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
693
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
926
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
861
Back
Top