Force on a point charge near a uniformly charged rod

AI Thread Summary
The equation for calculating the force on a point charge near a uniformly charged rod is incorrectly set up, confusing the constant length of the rod with the variable of integration. It is essential to keep these elements separate and to rewrite the integral accordingly. Contributions from the entire rod should be included, necessitating that the lower limit of integration starts at the left end of the rod. Participants encourage the use of LaTeX for posting equations to enhance clarity. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly setting up integrals in electrostatics problems.
athenad07
Messages
6
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
The charge per unit length on the thin rod shown here is What is the electric force on the point charge q? (See the preceding problem.)
Relevant Equations
here are the solution that I calculated, and I use the equation that E field equal to Force among charges over charges, but it yield quit different answer than the correct answer.
Screenshot 2024-10-27 at 15.14.04.png
Screenshot 2024-10-27 at 15.15.41.png
IMG_9426.JPG
IMG_9427.JPG
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This equation is set up incorrectly.

Screen Shot 2024-10-27 at 2.41.08 PM.png

  1. You are confusing the constant length of the rod ##l## with the variable of integration ##x##. You should keep the two separate and rewrite the integral.
  2. You want to add contributions from the entire rod, so the lower limit should be at the left end of the rod.
We would appreciate if you used LaTeX to post equations. To learn how, click on the link "LaTwX Guide", lower left, just above "Attach files."

(Edited for typos.)
 
Last edited:
Okay! I will next time, thank you for the advice. Seems I still have a long way to learn :)
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman and kuruman
athenad07 said:
Okay! I will next time, thank you for the advice. Seems I still have a long way to learn :)
Post your results when you're ready. We'll be here.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top