Force on a point from electric charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the net force on a bottom charge influenced by two side charges and one top charge. Participants express confusion over the correct application of Coulomb's Law and the distances used in calculations, particularly regarding the x and y components of the forces. The importance of separating forces into their components and correctly applying the cosine and sine functions is emphasized, with clarifications on the correct values for the forces and distances. Errors in previous calculations are pointed out, particularly in the use of the wrong value for the constant k and the misinterpretation of force directions. The conversation concludes with a focus on ensuring accurate calculations for both x and y components to achieve the correct net force.
rocapp
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



knight_Figure_25_46.jpg

What is the net force on the bottom charge?
Please give the force in Fx and Fy

Homework Equations



F=qE
E=kq/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Fx=2.88x10^-9N
Fy=-1.01x10^-4N

These aren't correct. I used the equation above and used

r=0.035m for both the side charges.

For the top charge,

r=0.05m

Why is the formula not working?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
rocapp said:

Homework Statement



knight_Figure_25_46.jpg

What is the net force on the bottom charge?
Please give the force in Fx and Fy

Homework Equations



F=qE
E=kq/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


Fx=2.88x10^-9N
Fy=-1.01x10^-4N

These aren't correct. I used the equation above and used

r=0.035m for both the side charges.

For the top charge,

r=0.05m

Why is the formula not working?

Thanks!

Why do you use r=3.5 cm for the side charges when r=5 cm is indicated?

ehild
 
I have to separate the forces into their x and y components, so the distance on the x-axis should be 3.5 cm. is this not the right approach?
 
How do you use the distance on the x-axis at all? Show your working in detail.

ehild
 
hi rocapp! :smile:
rocapp said:
I have to separate the forces into their x and y components, so the distance on the x-axis should be 3.5 cm. is this not the right approach?

nooo :redface:

you want Q/r2 times cosθ,

but you're using Q/(rcosθ)2 :wink:
 
Ohh! Thanks so much!
 
Does the 1nC charge affect itself in terms of force?

I keep getting wrong answers still.

-2.124×10^-23 N is the y-component I get from the -6nC charge.
1.00x10^-23 N is the y-component I get from both 2 nC charges on the 1 nC charge.
Fy = -1.124x10^-24 N

But that's not correct.

Fx=1.00x10^-23 N

Not sure if either of these are correct.
 
Last edited:
How did you get these data? Show your work in detail, please.

ehild
 
In the images attached are the exact equations I used for Fx and Fy.
 

Attachments

  • MSP83711ih34f3iiibf50dd0000307bi435h486g033.gif
    MSP83711ih34f3iiibf50dd0000307bi435h486g033.gif
    1.5 KB · Views: 516
  • MSP50951a9a2ef6392c2hda00002fa3dge1i579dcc5.gif
    MSP50951a9a2ef6392c2hda00002fa3dge1i579dcc5.gif
    1.3 KB · Views: 500
  • #10
You use wrong value for k in Coulomb's Law.

You need the resultant force on the bottom charge. Fx should be the horizontal component of the resultant force, Fy has to be the vertical component. What are the directions of the force components exerted bas the charges?

ehild
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Ah. Thanks for that!

The horizontal x component of the -6 nC charge is zero because it is directly above the 1 nC charge.

The horizontal x component of one of the 2 nC charges is:

Fx = (k*q*q/r^2)*cos(theta)
Fx = ((8.99x10^9)*(2x10^-9)*(1.0x10^-9)/(.05^2))*cos(45)
Fx = 5.09x10^-6 N

Since there are two, the total Fx = 2*5.09x10^-6 N = 1.02x10^-5 N

The y-components of the two 2 nC charges are the same as the x components because sin(45)=cos(45).

The y-component of the -6 nC charge is

Fy=((8.99x10^9)*(1.0x10^-9)*(-6x10^-9)/(0.05^2))
Fy= -2.16x10^-5 N

So the total Fy= Fy + Fy = (-2.16x10^-9) + (1.02x10^-5) = 1.02x10^-5 N

This is still not correct, though.
 
  • #12
rocapp said:
The horizontal x component of the -6 nC charge is zero because it is directly above the 1 nC charge.

The horizontal x component of one of the 2 nC charges is:

Fx = (k*q*q/r^2)*cos(theta)
Fx = ((8.99x10^9)*(2x10^-9)*(1.0x10^-9)/(.05^2))*cos(45)
Fx = 5.09x10^-6 N

Since there are two, the total Fx = 2*5.09x10^-6 N = 1.02x10^-5 N

Check the direction of these forces. Are not the x components opposite to each other?

rocapp said:
The y-components of the two 2 nC charges are the same as the x components because sin(45)=cos(45).

The y-component of the -6 nC charge is

Fy=((8.99x10^9)*(1.0x10^-9)*(-6x10^-9)/(0.05^2))
Fy= -2.16x10^-5 N

Show what you mean on positive y direction, up of down?

rocapp said:
So the total Fy= Fy + Fy = (-2.16x10^-9) + (1.02x10^-5) = 1.02x10^-5 N

This is still not correct, though.

Do not note the different force components with the same Fy. And you made a mistake, it is not 2.16x10^-9 but 2.16x10^-5.

ehild
 
  • #13
Thanks!
 
Back
Top