• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Force on an electron due to a dipole?

  • #1

Homework Statement


A dipole is centered at the origin, and is composed of charged particles with charge +e and -e, separated by a distance 9 ✕ 10-10 m along the y axis. The +e charge is on the -y axis, and the -echarge is on the +y axis.
An electron is located at <-3 ✕ 10^-8, 0, 0> m. What is the force on the electron, due to the dipole?

Homework Equations


Electric field of perpendicular charge: (9*10^9)(2qs)/(d^3)
where q = source charge, s = distance between the dipole charges, d = distance to observed location
F = qE, q = observed charge

The Attempt at a Solution


E = (9 x 10^9)(1.6 x 10^-19)(9 x 10^-10) / (3 x 10^-8)^3 = 48000
F = (-1.6 x 10^-19)(48000) = -7.68 x 10^-15
So in vector form, would this be <0, -7.68x10^-15, 0> ? I thought it would be <-3 x 10^-8, -7.68 x 10^-15, 0>, because the force vector would extend down from the observed location, but it turns out this is wrong... I'm semi-confident that the magnitude is correct...
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Simon Bridge
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
17,856
1,654
Did you try sketching how the forces from the two charges in the dipole act on the third charge?
 
  • #3
Yes I did, and the electric field is pointing in the +y direction, and the force is pointing in the -y direction... Is that correct?
 
  • #4
Simon Bridge
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
17,856
1,654
You can answer that question by considering the definition of the electric field in terms of a force.
You know the answer to this... what sort of charge does an electron carry?
 
  • #5
20,199
4,247
Physicslove22,

On what basis do you think that <0, -7.68x10^-15, 0> is wrong, and, even more intriguingly, on what basis do you think that <-3 x 10^-8, -7.68 x 10^-15, 0> is right?

Chet
 
  • #6
You can answer that question by considering the definition of the electric field in terms of a force.
You know the answer to this... what sort of charge does an electron carry?
Well an electron has a negative charge, so after being multiplied to a negative electric field, the force would be pointing in the positive direction.
 
  • #7
20,199
4,247
Well an electron has a negative charge, so after being multiplied to a negative electric field, the force would be pointing in the positive direction.
The force should be in the negative y direction (as you originally found). The positive charge is at negative y, and the negative charge is at positive y, so a negative charge on the x axis will be repelled downward by the negative charge and attracted downward by the positive charge.

Chet
 
  • #8
Physicslove22,

On what basis do you think that <0, -7.68x10^-15, 0> is wrong, and, even more intriguingly, on what basis do you think that <-3 x 10^-8, -7.68 x 10^-15, 0> is right?

Chet
I'm thinking about the way I would draw my answer as a vector on a graph that includes the two charges... It doesn't make sense to me that that the force vector would be <0, -7.68x10^-15, 0> so that it extends downward on the y-axis directly below the charges, instead of extending downward starting at the specified location, thus: <-3x10^-8, -7.68x10^-15, 0>...... I guess I must be missing some piece of information and it's throwing off my reasoning... :(
 
  • #9
The force should be in the negative y direction (as you originally found). The positive charge is at negative y, and the negative charge is at positive y, so a negative charge on the x axis will be repelled downward by the negative charge and attracted downward by the positive charge.

Chet
Oh whoops! I meant negative electric field... So what about the x axis value?
 
  • #10
20,199
4,247
I'm thinking about the way I would draw my answer as a vector on a graph that includes the two charges... It doesn't make sense to me that that the force vector would be <0, -7.68x10^-15, 0> so that it extends downward on the y-axis directly below the charges, instead of extending downward starting at the specified location, thus: <-3x10^-8, -7.68x10^-15, 0>...... I guess I must be missing some piece of information and it's throwing off my reasoning... :(
Have you drawn a diagram showing the lines of force resulting from the two charges of the dipole? Have you located on this diagram the test charge (electron) of interest? The lines of force diagram will tell all.

Chet
 
  • #11
Hmm well we haven't done that in class yet, but I think I can do it... Am I correct in drawing my electric field line from the electron's location at <-3x10^-8, 48000, 0>?
 
  • #12
20,199
4,247
Hmm well we haven't done that in class yet, but I think I can do it... Am I correct in drawing my electric field line from the electron's location at <-3x10^-8, 48000, 0>?
Actually, you can draw the lines of force schematically. You know what the lines of force look like for a single charge, and by combining the effects of the two charges, you can determine what the lines of force look like. Imagine the plus charge as a point source of flowing fluid, and the negative charge as a point sink of fluid. Figure out what the stream lines would look like. These will be the same as the lines of force in your electrostatics problem. Or google lines of force for dipole.

Chet
 
  • #13
Simon Bridge
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
17,856
1,654
It doesn't make sense to me that that the force vector would be <0, -7.68x10^-15, 0> so that it extends downward on the y-axis directly below the charges, instead of extending downward starting at the specified location,
... have you misunderstood the notation? The force does not act from the origin... that is not what the vector says. All the vector is telling you is the magnitude and direction... not location.

<0, F, 0 > is a force magnitude F pointing in the +y direction from wherever it's point of action is.
The force on the electron points in the -y direction, so that is <0,-eE, 0> from the location of the electron.

It is not like a position vector which tells you where something is in relation to some origin.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller
  • #14
... have you misunderstood the notation? The force does not act from the origin... that is not what the vector says. All the vector is telling you is the magnitude and direction... not location.

<0, F, 0 > is a force magnitude F pointing in the +y direction from wherever it's point of action is.
The force on the electron points in the -y direction, so that is <0,-eE, 0> from the location of the electron.

It is not like a position vector which tells you where something is in relation to some origin.

Ohhhhh wow I can't believe I was looking at it that way....

Actually, you can draw the lines of force schematically. You know what the lines of force look like for a single charge, and by combining the effects of the two charges, you can determine what the lines of force look like. Imagine the plus charge as a point source of flowing fluid, and the negative charge as a point sink of fluid. Figure out what the stream lines would look like. These will be the same as the lines of force in your electrostatics problem. Or google lines of force for dipole.

Chet
And I googled the force lines and the line is headed in the -y direction... thank you both for patiently guiding me to finding my stupid mistake! o0)
 
  • #15
Simon Bridge
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
17,856
1,654
Sometimes an idea gets stuck in our heads and it can be hard to spot - this is why we need to talk to other people ... well done.
 
  • Like
Likes Chestermiller

Related Threads on Force on an electron due to a dipole?

  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
7
Views
37K
Replies
3
Views
734
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
9K
Replies
6
Views
536
Top