Why is there a need to average the electric field between capacitor plates?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of the force between capacitor plates, highlighting that the force is given by \(\frac{1}{2}\epsilon_0 E^2 A\) rather than the expected \(QE = \epsilon_0 E^2 A\). Participants clarify that the electric field inside the conductor does not exert a force on itself, and only the external fields from the opposite plate contribute to the force experienced by each plate. It is emphasized that the total electric field inside the capacitor is a result of contributions from both plates, leading to the conclusion that each plate only feels half of the total field due to the other plate. The conversation ultimately reinforces that the interaction is based on the mutual influence of the plates rather than self-interaction. Understanding this concept is crucial for grasping the underlying physics of capacitors.
center o bass
Messages
545
Reaction score
2
As I have understood it, it is a classical problem to show that the force between to capacitorplates is \frac{1}{2}\epsilon _0 E^2 A, which is at first counterintuitive since one should think that it is QE = \epsilon_0 E^2 A. I am pondering that question a bit now and i saw the MIT lecture http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-02-electricity-and-magnetism-spring-2002/video-lectures/embed07/ where it is explained, but I don't quite get the explanation. When is it ever assumed that the conductor has any with? That is.. is it not only a plane in which it does not have a volume and therefore it is absurd to talk about the electric field inside the conductor?

And why would we ever have to average the two anayway? The efield inside doesn't apply any force. The only force on the plate is from the efield outside and that is certainly E.

Can anyone explain this to me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You would most certainly agree that the electric field outside the plate is due to both plates. You logic is wrong because a source (even extended one like a plate) can not apply force on itself due to its own field.One simple way to look at this is to assume that the plates have an individual field of E1 an E2. Then inside the plate E1-E2 =0 and outside E1+E2=σ/ε. Solve them and use the field of the other plate to calculate the force on the plate in question.
This result,valid for an infinite plate,is also used to calculate force on the points on a charged conductor due to obvious reasons.
 
Ah! So what you're really saying is that it's all solved with the fact that the plates can only apply forces to each other?

I have indeed assumed that the total field inside the capacitor exerts a force on a plate, but half of this field is ofcourse due to one plate itself... so ofcourse a particle moving inside that field would experience a force equal to qE, but the plates them selves does ofcourse only experience 0.5QE from each other. Right?
 
Yes right.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top