Force*Time graph with respect to momentum

  • Thread starter Thread starter Donnie_b
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graph Momentum
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the final velocity of a 3.0 kg object over an 8.0-second time period using a Force-Time graph. The initial calculation yielded a final velocity of 267 m/s, which was questioned due to its high value. Participants clarified that the area under the Force-Time graph represents impulse, which equals the change in momentum. By calculating the area as a trapezoid, the correct impulse was determined to be 600 N*s, leading to a final velocity of 200 m/s when assuming the initial velocity is zero. This method emphasizes the importance of accurately interpreting the graph to derive the correct velocity.
Donnie_b
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
graph.jpg


If the mass of the object is 3.0 kg, what is its final velocity over the 8.0 s time period?

This is the work I've done so far.

F∆t = m∆v
100 * 8.0 = 3.0 * v
v = 266.67

Now 267m/s seems quite high to me. So I think the problem I am having is that I'm reading the graph incorrectly and extrapolating the incorrect force from it. So basically, can anyone tell me if I have the correct amount of force listed down?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
One approach would be to re-scale the force axis by dividing by the mass of the object and effectively turning it into an acceleration-time graph. The change in speed is then given by the area under the graph.
 
The area under a Force-Time graph is Impulse (equivalent to change in momentum). You can find the area under the curve and that will equal your momentum change. This should allow you to calculate your velocity change.
 
DonnieB, Fizznerd is right, you need the area under the curve, and you do not need calculus, as that is a trapezoid. THe area of a trapezoid is the average of the bases times the height, which is (4 + 8)seconds/2*100 N = 600 N*s. Set this to mv - mv0, and assuming v0 is zero get v final = 200 m/s.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top