Forced oscillations and ressonance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the book "Mechanics" by Landau & Lifgarbagez, specifically regarding the phase constant beta in the driven force expression F(t) = f cos(gamma t + beta). Beta represents the initial configuration of the system, allowing for formulas that apply when the force does not vanish at t=0, while many textbooks simplify by assuming beta=0. Additionally, the participants seek a step-by-step derivation of the linear dependence of amplitude in resonance, as described in equation 22.5. The response indicates that this can be achieved using L'Hôpital's rule to evaluate limits approaching 0/0, particularly when gamma approaches omega. Overall, the discussion highlights the importance of understanding phase constants and resonance in forced oscillations.
williamsal
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi friends, I will be right to the point.

On the book "Mechanics" by Landau & Lifgarbagez, chapter "Small Oscillations", section "Forced Oscillations":
1. What is the meaning of the term beta (phase constant) on the expression for the driven force, F(t) = f cos(gamma t + beta), how it relates to the initial configuration of the system? And why almost all other textbooks just write F(t) = f cos(gamma t) without the phase constant, in this case, "beta"?

2. How can we get, step by step, the expression for the linear dependence of the amplitude in the ressonance case as described by the equation 22.5. I read dozens of texts and books like Goldstein, Symon, Marion, etc but none could give a clear guidance on how to get this expression.


Thans
Williams
 
Physics news on Phys.org
williamsal said:
Hi friends, I will be right to the point.

On the book "Mechanics" by Landau & Lifgarbagez, chapter "Small Oscillations", section "Forced Oscillations":
1. What is the meaning of the term beta (phase constant) on the expression for the driven force, F(t) = f cos(gamma t + beta), how it relates to the initial configuration of the system? And why almost all other textbooks just write F(t) = f cos(gamma t) without the phase constant, in this case, "beta"?

2. How can we get, step by step, the expression for the linear dependence of the amplitude in the ressonance case as described by the equation 22.5. I read dozens of texts and books like Goldstein, Symon, Marion, etc but none could give a clear guidance on how to get this expression.

1) Admitting an arbitrary beta allows one to develop forumlas valid in cases for which the force at t=0 does not vanish. If others assume beta=0 they have probably just done it for purposes of simplification.

2) I'm not going to do it here, but it is simply a case of using L'Hopitals rule for determining the value of a limit that approaches 0/0. What they are doing is to determine the expression 22.4 in the limit where gamma -> omega. The limit can be obtained by differentiating with respect to gamma independently in the numerator and denominator, and then take the limit gamma -> omega. For more info, look up L'Hopitals rule e..g on Wikipedia.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...

Similar threads

Back
Top