Forces acting on a spool of mass M

  • Thread starter Thread starter issacnewton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Mass
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on determining the ratio of forces F1 and F2 acting on a spool of mass M, with the goal of achieving zero friction while rolling. The equations of motion and torque are analyzed, leading to the expression for the force ratio as F1/F2 = (MR^2 + 2I)/(2(MR^2 - I)). Participants clarify the signs of angular acceleration and torque, agreeing that counterclockwise is positive. The calculations are confirmed to be correct after addressing initial misunderstandings regarding the torque equation. The final expression for the force ratio is accepted as accurate.
issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37

Homework Statement


Two forces ##F_1## and ##F_2## are applied on a spool of mass ##M##, moment of inertia, ##I##, and radius ##R## as shown in the figure. If the spool is rolling on the surface, find the ratio of forces, ##F_1/F_2## such that friction between spool and the surface is zero.

Homework Equations


##\tau = I\alpha## , ##\sum F = ma##

The Attempt at a Solution



Assume that the acceleration ##a## is toward right. So Newton's second law tells us that $$F_1 + F_2 = Ma$$ And the net torque on the spool is $$\tau = F_2 \left(\frac{R}{2}\right) - F_1 R = I \alpha $$
The condition for rolling without slipping tells us that ## a = \alpha R##. So plugging this in above equations we get, $$ \frac{F_2}{2} - F_1 = \frac{Ia}{R^2} $$ Now let ##x = F_1/F_2##, So above equations become $$ xF_2 + F_2 = Ma$$ and $$ \frac{F_2}{2} - xF_2 = \frac{Ia}{R^2} $$ Solving for ##x##, we get
$$x = \frac{F_1}{F_2} = \frac{MR^2 - 2I}{2(MR^2 + I)} $$ Does my solution seem right ?

Thanks
##\ddot\smile##
1.PNG
 

Attachments

  • 1.PNG
    1.PNG
    12.3 KB · Views: 421
Physics news on Phys.org
IssacNewton said:
$$ \frac{F_2}{2} - F_1 = \frac{Ia}{R^2} $$
Where did the R2 come from? Just R, no?

Edit: Sorry - misread an a as an alpha.

Also, not sure you have been consistent with signs on the accelerations. Which way are you taking as positive for the angular acceleration?
 
Last edited:
Since ##a = \alpha R##, ## \alpha = a/R ## and plugging this into the second equation will get us ##R^2## in the denominator on the right side. Since I assume the spool is accelerating towards right, this is clockwise rotation for the spool, so the angular acceleration will be going inside the page by right hand rule. And linear acceleration of the center of mass of the spool, ##a##, is towards right.
 
IssacNewton said:
Since ##a = \alpha R##, ## \alpha = a/R ## and plugging this into the second equation will get us ##R^2## in the denominator on the right side. Since I assume the spool is accelerating towards right, this is clockwise rotation for the spool, so the angular acceleration will be going inside the page by right hand rule. And linear acceleration of the center of mass of the spool, ##a##, is towards right.
see my edit re R2.

For the sign, I am still not sure which rotation you define as positive, clockwise or anticlockwise. Your a=αR implies clockwise, but your torque equation, ½RF2-RF1=Iα, implies anticlockwise.
 
Yes, you are right. In physics, we take counter clockwise rotations as positive. So since rotation is clockwise here, the magnitude of torque would be ##RF_1 - RF_2/2## and angular acceleration is in the same direction as the net torque, ##\tau##. If ##\alpha## is the magnitude of the angular acceleration, then we would have $$ RF_1 - RF_2/2 = I\alpha = \frac{Ia}{R}$$ So if I work it out again, I get
$$x = \frac{F_1}{F_2} = \frac{MR^2 + 2I}{2(MR^2 - I)} $$

Does it look Okay ?
 
IssacNewton said:
Yes, you are right. In physics, we take counter clockwise rotations as positive. So since rotation is clockwise here, the magnitude of torque would be ##RF_1 - RF_2/2## and angular acceleration is in the same direction as the net torque, ##\tau##. If ##\alpha## is the magnitude of the angular acceleration, then we would have $$ RF_1 - RF_2/2 = I\alpha = \frac{Ia}{R}$$ So if I work it out again, I get
$$x = \frac{F_1}{F_2} = \frac{MR^2 + 2I}{2(MR^2 - I)} $$

Does it look Okay ?
Yes, that looks right.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top