Forces necessary to hold a board steady (double check my work?)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the forces required to hold a board steady, using equations for equilibrium. The user initially calculated a negative value for B, which was corrected to a positive 477.4 N after re-evaluating the equations. The calculations for Fx and Fy were also adjusted, yielding values of 238.7 N and 27.6 N, respectively. Participants confirmed that the method used was appropriate and that the resulting numbers were reasonable. The consensus emphasizes the importance of ensuring that the net force is zero while recognizing that individual force components may not be zero.
Lotus93
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
This is the problem:
http://oi47.tinypic.com/6qij4o.jpg

I set fx, fy, and B equal to zero.
'x' forces: Fx - Bsin(30) = 0
'y' forces: Fy - mg + B(cos(30)) = 0
lower end: -0.5*mg(cos(30)) + 0.4*B = 0

Using the third equation I solved for B, and got -477.4.
I then plugged B into the first two equations and calculated Fy=854.4 and Fx=-238.7.

I don't feel confident in these numbers, so I wanted to double check with someone who has a better understanding. Did I go wrong somewhere, or does this look okay?
Thanks in advance, I really appreciate your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Lotus93 said:
This is the problem:
http://oi47.tinypic.com/6qij4o.jpg

I set fx, fy, and B equal to zero.
Why set all those to zero?
'x' forces: Fx - Bsin(30) = 0
'y' forces: Fy - mg + B(cos(30)) = 0
lower end: -0.5*mg(cos(30)) + 0.4*B = 0

Using the third equation I solved for B, and got -477.4.
I then plugged B into the first two equations and calculated Fy=854.4 and Fx=-238.7.

I don't feel confident in these numbers, so I wanted to double check with someone who has a better understanding. Did I go wrong somewhere, or does this look okay?
Thanks in advance, I really appreciate your help.
B should be positive !
 
I set them equal to zero because I thought the net force should be equal to 0 in order to hold the board still... is that wrong?
 
This is what I have now...

(-0.5)(m)(g)(cos(30))+(B)(0.4)=0
B=-(-.5)(45)(9.8)(cos(30))/0.4
B= 477.4

Fx-B(sin(30))=0
Fx=(477.4)(sin(30))
Fx= 238.7

Fy-mg+B(Cos(30))=0
Fy=-477.4(Cos(30))+(45)(9.8)
Fy=27.6Am I anywhere close to being right?
 
Last edited:
Lotus93 said:
I set them equal to zero because I thought the net force should be equal to 0 in order to hold the board still... is that wrong?
The net force is zero, but that doesn't mean that each individual component making up the net force is zero.
 
Lotus93 said:
This is what I have now...

(-0.5)(m)(g)(cos(30))+(B)(0.4)=0
B=-(-.5)(45)(9.8)(cos(30))/0.4
B= 477.4

Fx-B(sin(30))=0
Fx=(477.4)(sin(30))
Fx= 238.7

Fy-mg+B(Cos(30))=0
Fy=-477.4(Cos(30))+(45)(9.8)
Fy=27.6

Am I anywhere close to being right?
The method is right.

The numbers look reasonable.

Of course, all of those answers are in units of Newtons.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top