Calculating Forces on an L-Bracket for Supporting Large Pipework

AI Thread Summary
When installing an L-bracket to support large pipework in a brick chimney, it's crucial to calculate the forces on each fixing to prevent the bracket from detaching under load. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the moments and forces acting on the bracket, particularly the pivot point and the fixings labeled A and B. The condition for stability requires that the sum of moments around the pivot point equals zero, with the primary counteracting torque coming from the wall's interaction with fixing A. It is suggested that for a conservative calculation, fixing B can be ignored to account for potential bending of the bracket. Properly resolving these forces ensures the bracket remains securely attached when the pipes are filled with water.
GBE111
I am installing an L-shaped bracket into a brickwork chimney to support some large pipework. I am trying to work out the forces in each fixing to ensure that I won't be pulling the bracket off the wall once the pipes are filled with water.

I've tried drawing the free body diagram and to resolve the forces and the moments, but I'm not sure exactly how to do it. I've marked the location of where I believe the pivot point to be as X and the two fixings as A and B. Can someone please explain to me how to do this as it is a long time since I did my engineering degree!

P.S the force the fixing can withstand vertically in shear is different to the tensile force. I think this is relevant?

Many thanks,
 

Attachments

Engineering news on Phys.org
Hello GBE, :welcome:
GBE111 said:
to ensure that I won't be pulling the bracket off the wall
You have the right suspicion there: your ##\sum M = F_y L## seems only part of the story to me (this would be around an axis located on the wall; since the bottom point can't move to the left, let's take that as the preliminary potential axis of rotation)

The condition for 'no pulling offf the wall' would be ##\sum M = 0## and the counteracting torque comes from the wall pulling on plugs A (mainly) and B.

Safest calculation would ignore B (e.g. because the bracket starts to bend there, so the axis of rotation moves up to, worst case, B) and then A needs to resist pulling force $$F_y L\over y-x$$
Make sense ?
 
Here's a video by “driving 4 answers” who seems to me to be well versed on the details of Internal Combustion engines. The video does cover something that's a bit shrouded in 'conspiracy theory', and he touches on that, but of course for phys.org, I'm only interested in the actual science involved. He analyzes the claim of achieving 100 mpg with a 427 cubic inch V8 1970 Ford Galaxy in 1977. Only the fuel supply system was modified. I was surprised that he feels the claim could have been...
Thread 'Turbocharging carbureted petrol 2 stroke engines'
Hi everyone, online I ve seen some images about 2 stroke carbureted turbo (motorcycle derivation engine). Now.. In the past in this forum some members spoke about turbocharging 2 stroke but not in sufficient detail. The intake and the exhaust are open at the same time and there are no valves like a 4 stroke. But if you search online you can find carbureted 2stroke turbo sled or the Am6 turbo. The question is: Is really possible turbocharge a 2 stroke carburated(NOT EFI)petrol engine and...

Similar threads

Back
Top