Forces on Pendulum: Resolving mg & T

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter midlifephy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Pendulum
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 4K views
midlifephy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I find that the forces acting on a pendulum bob are treated in two different (contradictory?) ways.
Let the angle that the cord makes with the vertical be x, the mass of the bob m and the tension in the cord T.
1. In one case, the weight of the bob is resolved into components so that mgcos(x) is along T, so T = mgcos(x).
2. In another case, the tension is resolved into ITS components, so that mg = Tcos(x).
Obviously only one of them can be correct at one time. I can't figure out which of them to use and when.
I am a physics teacher, by the way.
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
midlifephy said:
1. In one case, the weight of the bob is resolved into components so that mgcos(x) is along T, so T = mgcos(x).
Why do you think that statement is true?
"mgcos(x) is along T" does not imply "T = mgcos(x)"
Draw a free body diagram.
 
midlifephy said:
I find that the forces acting on a pendulum bob are treated in two different (contradictory?) ways.
Let the angle that the cord makes with the vertical be x, the mass of the bob m and the tension in the cord T.
1. In one case, the weight of the bob is resolved into components so that mgcos(x) is along T, so T = mgcos(x).
2. In another case, the tension is resolved into ITS components, so that mg = Tcos(x).
Obviously only one of them can be correct at one time. I can't figure out which of them to use and when.
I am a physics teacher, by the way.
Thanks in advance.
Neither of these two are correct.

[tex]ma_r = mgcos(x) - T[/tex]
[tex]a_r = -L\dot{x}^2[/tex]