Formula for average acceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the average acceleration of a jet plane that increases its speed from 300 m/s to 400 m/s over a distance of 4.0 km. Initial attempts to use the formula for average acceleration were incorrect due to miscalculating the elapsed time. Participants suggested using Galileo's formula, which relates final and initial velocities, acceleration, and distance. By setting up a system of equations based on basic kinematic formulas, the correct acceleration was determined to be 8.75 m/s². The conversation highlights the importance of using appropriate formulas and careful calculations in physics problems.
mugzieee
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
A jet plane is cruising at 300 m/s when suddenly the pilot turns the engines up to full throttle. After traveling 4.0 km, the jet is moving with a speed of 400 m/s.What is the jet's acceleration, assuming it to be a constant acceleration?

first i converted 4km to m. then i said that since at first he was traveling 300m/s, it must of taken him about 13.33 seconds to reach 400m/s. then i followed the formula for average acceleration, which is vf-vi/tf-ti, and i get a wrong answer. what am i doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
HINT:Use Galieo Galilei's formula
v^{2}_{fin}=v^{2}_{init}+2ad

Daniel.
 
mugzieee said:
A jet plane is cruising at 300 m/s when suddenly the pilot turns the engines up to full throttle. After traveling 4.0 km, the jet is moving with a speed of 400 m/s.What is the jet's acceleration, assuming it to be a constant acceleration?

first i converted 4km to m. then i said that since at first he was traveling 300m/s, it must of taken him about 13.33 seconds to reach 400m/s. then i followed the formula for average acceleration, which is vf-vi/tf-ti, and i get a wrong answer. what am i doing wrong?

You didn't properly account for acceleration and computed the elapsed time incorrectly. You can use the Galieo formula indicated in the previous msg, but you may not remember that formula on a test. Sometimes it's best to concentrate on a few "basic" formulas which are fairly inuitive and easy to remember. Thus the following solution, although longer, may also have a place in your suite of mathemagical tools. We start with the following basic formulas valid for constant acceleration A:

V_f = V_i + A*t
D = V_i*t + (1/2)*A*t^2

where "D" is distance, "Vi" is INITIAL velocity, "Vf" is FINAL velocity, and "t" is Elapsed Time. For your problem:
D = (4 km) = (4000 m)
Vi = (300 m/s)
Vf = (400 m/s)

Thus, we can substitute values and set up a system of 2 equations in 2 unknowns ("A" and "t"):
(400) = (300) + A*t ::: Eq #1
(4000) = (300)*(t) + (1/2)*A*(t^2) ::: Eq #2

Solving for "t" in Eq #1 and placing the resulting expression in Eq #2:
t = 100/A
(4000) = (300)*(100/A) + (1/2)*A*((100/A)^2)
40 = 300/A + (1/2)*A*(100/A)*(1/A)
40 = 300/A + 50/A

A = (8.75 m/sec^2)
 
thank you very much for the replies guys, it was a lot of help.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top