This is not how we work here. We will gladly help you find the solution, but we won't do you work for you.merlyn said:Hi all. Could someone work out for me how equation 21 in attachment left side becomes right side. Please show in detail if you could.
It's for exponential Fourier series.
sophiecentaur said:@merlyn Have you tried any other sources? It's been a long time but is your problem with collapsing the product of two exponentials into one (with n-m in it) or doing the (trivial?) definite integral (∫eax dx) after that? Or is it the 1/(n-m) term on the RHS, when n=m?
The argument goes onto the next page of your book. What happens there?
General rule for multiplying exponentials: ##e^a e^b = e^{a+b}##.merlyn said:It's mainly collapsing the the two 'e' into one.
jtbell said:General rule for multiplying exponentials: ##e^a e^b = e^{a+b}##.
jtbell said:OK, so now you have the integral $$\int_0^L e^{i 2\pi (n-m) x/L} \, dx$$ Do you know how to integrate exponentials? The exponential looks messy, but it's just a big messy constant times x. Simplify it for a moment by collapsing the big messy constant into a new one, ##a = i 2\pi (n-m) /L##. Can you do this one? $$\int_0^L e^{ax} \, dx$$
Your presentation is very confusing. There is a button ∑ on the menu bar that gives you a whole selection of symbols - including πmerlyn said:Right..But that really does not help in this case.
All you get is ##e^(i2pinx-i2pimx)/l##
right?
and
##e^(i2pix(n-m))/l##
sophiecentaur said:Your presentation is very confusing. There is a button ∑ on the menu bar that gives you a whole selection of symbols - including π![]()
sophiecentaur said:Your presentation is very confusing. There is a button ∑ on the menu bar that gives you a whole selection of symbols - including π![]()
This is off topic, but I use the exact same edition.jtbell said:This made me dig in my closet to see if I still have my old book of math tables. Printed in 1986.
I can sympathise that you are out of touch with Calculus. If you really feel you need to get to grips with Fourier then it will be a long hard slog, I think. I can't recommend any particular learning resource but you will need more than just a list of integrals. The way many people look on Fourier is over simplified and they often come to wrong conclusions about what it really involves.merlyn said:I'll look up my integral tables tonight and see.
Thank you so far.
Ok.sophiecentaur said:I can sympathise that you are out of touch with Calculus. If you really feel you need to get to grips with Fourier then it will be a long hard slog, I think. I can't recommend any particular learning resource but you will need more than just a list of integrals. The way many people look on Fourier is over simplified and they often come to wrong conclusions about what it really involves.