Is the Fracture Energy Equation for Ice Valid?

  • Thread starter Thread starter lewisd18
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Fracture
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the validity of using the equation for fracture energy of ice, expressed as potential energy divided by cross-sectional area. Participants confirm that this approach is rational, as it yields units of J/m², indicating energy per unit area. The equation is deemed appropriate for calculating the fracture energy after applying weights until the ice breaks. The consensus supports the method's applicability in a homework context. Overall, the equation for fracture energy in ice is considered valid based on the provided reasoning.
lewisd18
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


i have been told i can use the equation potential energy/cross sectional area to work out fracture energy of ice after dropping weights on it till it breaks. is this true?


Homework Equations


fracture energy = potential energy/cross sectional area


The Attempt at a Solution


as above
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems rational: as the units you would be given are Jm^{-2} which would imply the energy per unit area.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top