Free particle in spherical polar coords

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving the time-independent Schrödinger equation for a free particle in spherical polar coordinates with an azimuthal quantum number l=0. The radial equation simplifies to a second-order differential equation, leading to the solution u(r) = A sin(kr) for the radial wavefunction R(r). Normalization of R(r) is addressed, highlighting the need to incorporate the angular integration factor of 4π in the normalization process. The use of the Dirac delta function in this context is questioned, with emphasis on the importance of integrating over the full volume. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the correct approach to finding and normalizing the radial wavefunction for a free particle.
cscott
Messages
778
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Consider the time-independent Schrodinger equation in spherical polar coordinates for a free particle, in the case where we have an azimuthal quantum number l=0.

(a) Solve the radial equation to find the (unnormalized) radial wavefunction R(r).
(b) Normalize R(r), using the definition of the dirac delta function \delta(k'-k).

Homework Equations



Radial Equation:

u(r) = rR(r)

-\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{d^2u}{dr^2} + \left[V + \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{l(l+1)}{r^2}\right]u = Eu

The Attempt at a Solution



For a free particle, V=0, and with l = 0 the radial equation reduces to,

\frac{d^2u}{dr^2}=-k^2u,~~k=\frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{\hbar},

with solution,

u = A\sin(kr) + B\cos(kr),

but u(r)=rR(r), so B=0 for a normalizable wavefunction (considering r->0). Therefore,

R(r) = \frac{A}{r}\sin(kr)

and to normalize,

\int_{0}^{\inf} r^2|R(r)|^2~dr = 1

|A|^2 \int_{0}^{\inf} \sin^2(kr)~dr=1

How do I use the dirac delta function?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Should I keep u as,

u(r)=Ae^{ikr}

R(r)=\frac{A}{r}e^{ikr}
 
Hi

Sorry, but I don't see why do you need to use the delta of k'-k. I would integrate the sine square but the problem is that you forgot the integration for the angular variables. Thus there is a "4 times pi" factor missed which should be at RHS of the last equation as denominator of 1/(4*pi) since the 4*pi is the result of the integration of

\int sin\theta d\theta \int d\varphi

This comes from the fact that to normalize you have to integrate in a volume whose differential element is

dv= r^2 sin\theta dr d\theta d\varphi

But I don't see anything else to be added.
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top