Freefall with unknown designation of length

  • Thread starter Thread starter PatrickR.
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Freefall Length
AI Thread Summary
An object falls a distance h from rest, with 0.42h covered in the last second of its fall. The acceleration due to gravity is -9.8 m/s², and the equations of motion are applied to find the total time and height of the fall. By using the equations s = ut + 1/2at² and u = g(t-1), the total fall time is calculated to be approximately 4.19 seconds. Substituting this time back into the equations yields a height of about 86.21 meters. The calculations demonstrate the relationship between distance, time, and acceleration in free fall.
PatrickR.
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
An object falls a distance h from rest. If it travels 0.42h in the last 1.00 s, find (a) the time and (b) the height of its fall.

so I know a=-g

and I believe I need to use v= v0 + at to some extent.

I also believe that they are trying to say that in the last 1s of the fall it traveled 42% of the total distance.

however because a=-9.8m/s/s and I am given "h" and not m I do not know how to incorporate that into the equation.

Greatly of appreciative of any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't worry about the signs in the equations you'll have to use since it FALLS h and so you'd be as well saying everything downward is positive.

The way I've done this is a bit longwinded but... hopefully useful...

You need also the equation,

<br /> s = ut + \frac{1}{2}at^2,<br />
where u is the initial velocity and s the distance fallen.

You have an equation for its overall journey where s = h, u = 0 and a = g.
You have an equation for the last second where s = 0.42h, a = g, t = 1.
You can work out u for the last second of the journey using u = v_0 + at = g(t-1) where t in this equation is the total time and you minus the last second of journey.

The first equation can be used then with the second equation (since we have worked out u from the third equation) to find t (might mean using the quadratic formula), then you use this in the first to find h.

You hadn't a reply yet and i thought it interesting so i had a go myself... just have a go at following what I've said through and hopefully it all works.
 
Loonychune, thank you so much you've been of great help.

so to solve

Eqn1. h=(1/2)at2

Eqn2. .42h=(1/2)(9.8)(1)2 + u

Eqn3. u=(9.8)(t-1)

plugging 3 into 2 we get h= (-4.9 + 9.8t)/.42

plugging 2 into 1 we get 4.9t2 + -23.3333t + 11.6667=0

the only good root is t= 4.19415 s as our total fall time

so plugging t in for eqn1. h=86.21 m
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top