Friction and forces in rollers

  • Thread starter Thread starter bootsnbraces
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces Friction
AI Thread Summary
To calculate the required force to transmit torque between two smooth-edged discs, the frictional force can be determined using the formula f = μN, where N is the normal force. The torque transmitted is equal to the product of the frictional force and the radius of the second disc (fR). The area of contact does not influence the required force, meaning that regardless of the length of the discs, the same force is needed to prevent slipping at a given torque. The length of the cylinders should be sufficient to maintain low surface stress and prevent buckling. Understanding these principles allows for effective calculations in friction and torque transmission.
bootsnbraces
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
HI all wonder if anyone can help I am banging my head on this one! If i have 2 discs of a given material with smooth edges (imagine 2 gears side to side but no teeth) How do i calculate the required force to create enough friction to transmit a given amount of torque between the 2? i have the coefficent of friction for the 2 materials and the torque required but I am struggling with the area of contact between the 2 edges (a straight line contact i think?) and the force required to stop slip. I've got a feeling this has something to do with the normal force?


Thanks in advance harry
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your force of friction would be f=\mu N where N is the normal force. The product fR where R is the radius of the second disc will be equal to the torque being transmitted.

So you need R here. And just one thing, I wouldn't call the edges smooth because that usually means frictionless in most contexts. But I know what you mean here, its just gears with no teeth.
 
And notice you don't need to know the area of contact.
 
What do you meant by

bootsnbraces said:
calculate the required force to create enough friction to transmit a given amount of torque between the 2

Where and in which direction are you applying the force?

If coefficient of friction μ is given, I think you can compute the normal force required.
 
zeal science- the force is pushing the 2 rollers together side on like over meshing a pair of gears (only no teeth on the rollers)

So f=μN where N is the normal force. The product fR where R is the radius of the second disc will be equal to the torque being transmitted.

So for example radius 0.5m and torque of 10kg/m the force required would be 20N? and with a coefficient of friction of 1 that would equate to a normal force of 20N?

Sorry if that's all wrong I am trying to work in these modern units to make it mroe readable and it doesn't help!
 
Hi all, well some time studying the equations and a bit of experimentings put me on the right tracks! from the fact that no area of contact is included in the equations I am gathering that the length of the line of contact between the cylinders has no effect on the required force?

I.e wether the discs were cd's or 6ft long cylinders they will require the same force to stop them from slipping at a given torque?
In which case I am guessing the length of the cylinders would only need be long enough to keep the surface stress caused by the force low enough and the cylinder thick enough not to buckle under the force?

Thanks
harry
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top