Friction and Scale Readings for a Cuboid on a Weighing Scale

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eitan Levy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scale Weighing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the physics of a cuboid on a weighing scale, analyzing the effects of tension and friction when a supporting yarn is torn. The initial state shows the cuboid at rest, with the scale reading the combined weight of the cuboid and any hanging mass. After the yarn is torn, the participants explore the changes in scale readings and friction forces, emphasizing the importance of correctly defining the system and drawing accurate free body diagrams. Misinterpretations of forces and accelerations are highlighted, stressing the need for clarity in visual representations to avoid confusion in complex scenarios. Overall, the conversation focuses on refining problem-solving approaches in physics related to forces and motion.
Eitan Levy
Messages
259
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


upload_2017-12-22_15-9-47.png

A cuboid with a mass of M is put on a weighing scale.
First the situation is the one in the picture (the ball doesn't move), the cuboid stays on the cuboid without moving.
What will the scale show?
Now yarn number 2 is torn, the cuboid still doesn't move.
What will the scale show right after the yarn is torn?
What is the friction force that the scale will apply on the cuboid right after the yarn is torn?
What will the scale show when α=0?
What is the friction force will apply on the cuboid right when α=0?

Homework Equations


ar=v2/r
ma=F

The Attempt at a Solution


I don't have the answers to my question so I have no idea if I am correct or not.
When yarn number 2 still isn't torn:
upload_2017-12-22_15-19-10.png

mg=T1cosα
T1sinα=T2
So, fs=0
N=T1cosα+Mg=(M+m)g[/B]

Right after the yarn is torn:
upload_2017-12-22_15-23-55.png

ar=v2/r=0
T1=mgcosα
N=Mg+T1cosα
N=Mg+mgcos2α
fs=T1sinα
fs=mgsinαcosα

When α=0
upload_2017-12-22_15-27-58.png

fs=0
Let's say the the length of yarn number 1 is l
Energy right after the yarn is torn: E0=mgl(1-cosα)
Energy when α=0: E1=0.5mv2
E0=E1
v2=2-2cosα
mar=T1-mg
ar=v2/r
T1=mg(1+2-2cosα)=mg(3-2cosα)
N=Mg+T1=Mg+mg(3-2cosα).


Does everything seem correct? I am really uncertain about this.
Thanks a lot!
 

Attachments

  • upload_2017-12-22_15-9-47.png
    upload_2017-12-22_15-9-47.png
    7.6 KB · Views: 797
  • upload_2017-12-22_15-19-10.png
    upload_2017-12-22_15-19-10.png
    5.9 KB · Views: 463
  • upload_2017-12-22_15-23-55.png
    upload_2017-12-22_15-23-55.png
    4.5 KB · Views: 478
  • upload_2017-12-22_15-27-58.png
    upload_2017-12-22_15-27-58.png
    4.1 KB · Views: 384
Physics news on Phys.org
You show too many forces in your diagrams. It seems you are confused about what your system is. First you should decide what your system is. Your choices are (a) cuboid only; (b) hanging mass with string only; (c) cuboid and hanging mass together. Then consider what objects outside your chosen system act on it. Draw them in and analyze them.

Also, take a good look at your last drawing for it illustrates what I am saying. It shows an unbalanced force to the left, yet you claim the acceleration is zero. Can that be?
 
kuruman said:
You show too many forces in your diagrams. It seems you are confused about what your system is. First you should decide what your system is. Your choices are (a) cuboid only; (b) hanging mass with string only; (c) cuboid and hanging mass together. Then consider what objects outside your chosen system act on it. Draw them in and analyze them.

Also, take a good look at your last drawing for it illustrates what I am saying. It shows an unbalanced force to the left, yet you claim the acceleration is zero. Can that be?

I thought it would better visually for you to look on. When I solve I draw each body by itself.
I show the force but says it equals to zero later, obviously in the exam I won't draw that force but explain why it's zero.
 
Eitan Levy said:
I thought it would better visually for you to look on.
It is not because it isn't clear what you are drawing a free body diagram of. This way of drawing free body diagrams will lead you into trouble when you get to problems that involve torques where the point of application of the forces matters. Although your answers are all correct, there should be no forces drawn on the left side of the box because there is nothing on that side that can exert a force. The reaction forces due to the tension in the strings should be drawn at the other side of the strings where it's tied to the ceiling and the wall. Also, friction should be drawn at the point of contact.

Drawing action-reaction counterparts in a multi-component free body diagram does no harm if done correctly because one adds and subtracts a vector, i.e. adds the zero vector. However, that makes the picture more confusing to read and increases the likelihood of adding something that doesn't belong.
 
  • Like
Likes Eitan Levy
kuruman said:
It is not because it isn't clear what you are drawing a free body diagram of. This way of drawing free body diagrams will lead you into trouble when you get to problems that involve torques where the point of application of the forces matters. Although your answers are all correct, there should be no forces drawn on the left side of the box because there is nothing on that side that can exert a force. The reaction forces due to the tension in the strings should be drawn at the other side of the strings where it's tied to the ceiling and the wall. Also, friction should be drawn at the point of contact.

Drawing action-reaction counterparts in a multi-component free body diagram does no harm if done correctly because one adds and subtracts a vector, i.e. adds the zero vector. However, that makes the picture more confusing to read and increases the likelihood of adding something that doesn't belong.
Alright, thank you for your advice.
 
Looks like a good advice. Thank you so much!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top