Friction on a casing on a metal ring

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the distance a casing glides on a metal ring before stopping due to friction. The initial kinetic energy is converted into work done against friction, which is influenced by both gravitational and centripetal forces. The participants explore the integration of the velocity function to find the distance, with one suggesting a substitution method to simplify the integration process. There is a consensus that the problem is complex, particularly due to the non-linear nature of the acceleration and the need to combine forces as vectors. The conversation highlights the challenges of applying differential equations and integrating to derive the expected solution.
Victarion
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A casing of mass m can glide along a thin metal ring lying horizontally. It has an initial speed of v0. How long a distance s will it glide before stopping if its friction coefficient is μ?

The answer is given as

s = r/2μ * ln( v02 + √(v02 + g2r2)/ g * r )

The task is to provide the deductive path to reach that answer.

Homework Equations



Centripetal force: mv2/r

Gravitational force: mg

Kinetic energy: mv2/2

The Attempt at a Solution



The casing will stop once all the kinetic energy has turned into friction work. The friction is a sum of that caused by the gravitational force and the centripetal force. The friction work Wf is thus

Wf = s * F = s * μ * ( mv2/r + mg )

Since Wf is equal to the kinetic energy we can write the following equation:

s = Kinetic energy / F = (mv2/2) / (μ * ( mv2/r + mg ))

This can be quite cleanly simplified into something that looks similar to the answer I am supposed to reach:

s = r/2μ * ( v2/ (gr + v2) )

But this is where I run into a brick wall. I can't figure out how to integrate it properly, all the similar equations I have seen integrated seem to include arctan somewhere in the answer.

I apologise any mistakes I made in the translation of the problem and in laying them out clearly, and thank you for your attention!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I haven't solved this, just starting now, but already I am thinking the two forces must be combined as vectors not simply added. We have mg vertically and mv²/R horizontally so the combined force magnitude will be the common m times the square root of g² + (v²/R)². Also, the velocity is a variable, and it has a complicated non-linear acceleration μF so we are in for some trouble - can we even find the velocity function?

This problem looks tough for me; I have long since forgotten my differential equations class 40 years ago so I hope others will pitch in!
 
I am pretty sure that friction of this kind means that we do not have to look on the forces as vectors. What the friction coefficient is, as far as I am aware, is the portion of a perpendicular force that is turned into friction, and friction is by definition a force that is directly opposed to the movement of the object.

If that made any sense.

The velocity function sounds tricky to find. The way I figured we would get the value for s is by integrating the function with regards to v, with v going from v0 to 0. Since we know the start and end points of the interval I was hoping we would not need any closer information on how quickly the casing actually decelerates, but that depends on actually getting an analytical answer to the integral.

I really appreciate your input by the way!
 
Friction depends on the normal force, pressing the slider against the ring. That is the vector sum of the horizontal and vertical forces so I'm pretty sure the normal force magnitude is square root of {g² + (v²/R)²} all right.

I'm playing with this, writing F = ma, μFn = ma,
a = dv/dt = μF/m where F = the square root above.
This looks like it might be possible to integrate with a substitution. If you could get it to say
dw/sqrt(1 + w²) = constants * dt
could you integrate it? If so, try to come up with a w substitution that incorporates the R and a g so you can factor out the g from the square root and leave just (1 + w²) under the square root. If you need a hint, try letting w = v*sqrt(R) and see how it simplifies.
 
Last edited:
I did the integration and was able to solve it for v and integrate again to get x.
But I didn't get anything like the answer given for the question!
It is probably worth you working it through, though - I'm having a lot of trouble with calculations these days.
Your turn to help me! Hopefully somebody else will pitch in.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top