Friction problem - Relation between coefficient of friction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a scenario where a man is attempting to slide a box on a rough horizontal surface, with a focus on the relationship between the coefficients of friction and the masses involved. Participants are exploring conditions under which the box cannot be slid based on the coefficients of friction between the man, the box, and the surface.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of Newton's third law and the conditions under which the box can or cannot slide. They analyze inequalities related to the forces acting on both the man and the box, questioning how to derive relationships between the coefficients of friction and the masses.

Discussion Status

Several participants are engaged in examining specific cases and inequalities to determine which conditions prevent the box from sliding. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the inequalities derived from the problem statement, with some participants expressing confusion and seeking clarification on their reasoning.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering specific cases and numerical examples to test their understanding, while also being reminded to focus on general principles rather than specific values. The discussion includes checking assumptions about the relationships between the coefficients of friction and the masses involved.

Saitama
Messages
4,244
Reaction score
93

Homework Statement


A man of mass m is applying a horizontal force to slide a box of mass m' on a rough horizontal surface. It is known that the man does not slide. The coefficient of friction between the shoes of the man and the floor is ##\mu## and between the box and the floor is ##\mu'##. In which of the following cases it is certainly not possible to slide the box?
A) μ>μ', m<m'
B) μ<μ', m<m'
C) μ<μ', m>m'
D) μ>μ', m>m'


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


If man applies a force F on box, due to Newton's third law, he also experiences a force F in the opposite direction. According to the question, F<=μmg and F<=μ'm'g. Also, since it is given that man does not slide, F has to be less than or equal to μmg. The box can slide if μ'm'g<F<μmg. The block never slides if μmg<μ'm'g. But I don't see how to find relation between the coefficient of friction and masses by considering the above inequalities.

Any help is appreciated. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pranav-Arora said:
The box can slide if μ'm'g<F<μmg. The block never slides if μmg<μ'm'g.
OK.

But I don't see how to find relation between the coefficient of friction and masses by considering the above inequalities.
Go through the set of choices and see which ones make that second inequality true.
 
Doc Al said:
Go through the set of choices and see which ones make that second inequality true.

Call f as the friction force on man and f' on box. For the first case,
Let μ=0.6, μ'=0.5, m=3 kg and m'=5kg. Then f=18N and f'=25N. Here f<f' so A is the answer but the given answer is B. :confused:
 
Pranav-Arora said:
Call f as the friction force on man and f' on box. For the first case,
Let μ=0.6, μ'=0.5, m=3 kg and m'=5kg. Then f=18N and f'=25N. Here f<f' so A is the answer but the given answer is B. :confused:
Don't plug in specific numbers. You want an answer that will make it impossible to slide for any number in the given range.

What's an easy way to ensure that μmg<μ'm'g? One of the given choices ensures that will inequality will be met.
 
Doc Al said:
What's an easy way to ensure that μmg<μ'm'g? One of the given choices ensures that will inequality will be met.

I am still confused. The inequality can be rearranged as m'>(μ/μ')m. For the first case, μ/μ'>1 so I guess (μ/μ')m may become greater than m' so first is false. Is this a correct way to put it?
 
Pranav-Arora said:
The inequality can be rearranged as m'>(μ/μ')m. For the first case, μ/μ'>1 so I guess (μ/μ')m may become greater than m' so first is false. Is this a correct way to put it?
Yes. That shows that choice A won't work.

Now look at choice B.
 
Doc Al said:
Now look at choice B.

In this case μ<μ' and m<m'. Rearranging as before, m'>(μ/μ')m. Already, m < m' and since (μ/μ')<1, the product on the RHS becomes more smaller and hence it is always true. Correct?
 
Pranav-Arora said:
In this case μ<μ' and m<m'. Rearranging as before, m'>(μ/μ')m. Already, m < m' and since (μ/μ')<1, the product on the RHS becomes more smaller and hence it is always true. Correct?
Yes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Doc Al said:
Yes.

Thanks a lot Doc Al! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K