Friction & Rolling Motion: Effects Explored

AI Thread Summary
Friction significantly influences the type of rolling motion an object experiences. When friction exceeds the required amount for rolling, the object tends to spin, while insufficient friction leads to sliding instead of rolling. The transition between rolling and sliding is affected by factors such as the mass of the object and the varying resistances of rolling versus sliding. A precise balance between rolling friction and sliding friction is difficult to maintain, as any motion tends to favor the path of least resistance. Ultimately, the dynamics of motion dictate that an object will either roll, slide, or a combination of both depending on the frictional forces at play.
drragonx
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
How does friction affect the type of rolling motion of an object. For instance, does having more friction than the required friction for rolling cause the object to spin?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Friction is the resistance to motion. Force is required to overcome resistance then acceleration occurs and friction increases.
 
jerromyjon said:
Friction is the resistance to motion. Force is required to overcome resistance then acceleration occurs and friction increases.
I think you misunderstood me. A typical example is a ball rolling down an igloo from the top. The friction changes as it goes along the surface. So, when the ball starts sliding, is the friction less than or greater than required friction for rolling?
 
Now I think I understand your question... the line between rolling and sliding, would vary greatly depending I think mostly on the mass of the ball then on the rolling resistance versus the sliding resistance which would be less to slide or more to roll. Similar to a car skidding on ice, braking increases rolling resistance.
 
Correct me if i am wrong: The ball would spin (rotational>linear) if friction>required OR slid (linear>rotational) if friction<required. Finally, the ball would pure roll (vcm=rw) if friction=required.
 
It would be a razor sharp line where rolling friction = sliding friction... it is a dynamic situation, any way I think about it there is not a way to maintain a balance there. Even if the ball starts on a surface where these frictions are balanced, sliding would cause some rolling or rolling would cause some sliding. No matter what the ball is going down its just which ever the least resistive way to get there is.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top