Frictional Forces: Find Max F for No Slippage of m1 on m2

  • Thread starter Thread starter zhaos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the maximum force, F, that can be applied to block 2 without causing block 1 to slip on top of it, given a coefficient of static friction, mu. The user initially derived the equation F = g * mu (m1 + m2) and questioned the validity of their reasoning, later confirming that their calculations were correct. When considering the scenario where block 1 does slip, the conversation shifts to using the coefficient of kinetic friction, mu k, and recognizing that the accelerations of the two blocks would differ. The final consensus emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between the accelerations of the blocks when slipping occurs. Overall, the user successfully navigates through the problem and clarifies their understanding of frictional forces in this context.
zhaos
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I am studying for an exam and changed a practice problem by putting the force on the bottom block (you'll see). I just wanted to check if my thinking is correct.

Homework Statement


Two blocks sit on top of each other, block 1 (m1) on top of block 2 (m2), on a frictionless surface. There is friction between the two blocks, coefficient of static friction mu. If a horizontal force, F, is applied to the block 2, what is the greatest magnitude of F that can be applied such that block 1 does not slip?

Homework Equations


Sum of forces = ma

The Attempt at a Solution


We mainly need to concern ourselves with the horizontal physics.
Is it valid that I consider the forces on block 2 and the forces on block 1?
Block 2: F - m1 * g * mu = m2 * a
Block 1: m1 * g * mu = m1 * a
Also, F = (m1 + m2)a

So then, I used equations for block 1 and block 2, to solve for F. I got F = g * mu (m1 + m2). Looks like F = (m1 + m2)a isn't very useful.

Is this the right reasoning and the right answer?

Perhaps the weird thing for me is that let's say I use the equation for block 2 and the equation F = (m1 + m2)a. If I substitute in (m1 + m2)a for F, then I can solve for a and get g * mu. If I substitute F / (m1+m2) for a, and solve for F, I get a much more complex expression [m1 * g * mu (m1 + m2)] / (m1 + 2*m2). I wonder if this is the same? It works out dimensionally, but not numerically if I choose random values for m1 and m2. What did I do wrong?

update again: oh oh. no I guess it's right, I did the math wrong. The third way solving for F does give the same answer. Never mind.

so i think what i did is right..

But what about this complexity? Let's say F were great enough for the top block to slip. How would I consider the forces in such a situation, given mu k and mu s?

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


zhaos said:
Hi all, I am studying for an exam and changed a practice problem by putting the force on the bottom block (you'll see). I just wanted to check if my thinking is correct.

Homework Statement


Two blocks sit on top of each other, block 1 (m1) on top of block 2 (m2), on a frictionless surface. There is friction between the two blocks, coefficient of static friction mu. If a horizontal force, F, is applied to the block 2, what is the greatest magnitude of F that can be applied such that block 1 does not slip?

Homework Equations


Sum of forces = ma


The Attempt at a Solution


We mainly need to concern ourselves with the horizontal physics.
Is it valid that I consider the forces on block 2 and the forces on block 1?
Block 2: F - m1 * g * mu = m2 * a
Block 1: m1 * g * mu = m1 * a
Also, F = (m1 + m2)a

So then, I used equations for block 1 and block 2, to solve for F. I got F = g * mu (m1 + m2). Looks like F = (m1 + m2)a isn't very useful.

Is this the right reasoning and the right answer?

Perhaps the weird thing for me is that let's say I use the equation for block 2 and the equation F = (m1 + m2)a. If I substitute in (m1 + m2)a for F, then I can solve for a and get g * mu. If I substitute F / (m1+m2) for a, and solve for F, I get a much more complex expression [m1 * g * mu (m1 + m2)] / (m1 + 2*m2). I wonder if this is the same? It works out dimensionally, but not numerically if I choose random values for m1 and m2. What did I do wrong?

update again: oh oh. no I guess it's right, I did the math wrong. The third way solving for F does give the same answer. Never mind.

so i think what i did is right..
Yes, good. The extra equation serves as a good check that you did your work correctly when using the other 2 equations.
But what about this complexity? Let's say F were great enough for the top block to slip. How would I consider the forces in such a situation, given mu k and mu s?

Thanks.
In that case, the top block slips, so it will have a different acceleration with respect to the ground than the bottom block's acceleration with respect to the ground. The bottom block's acceleration with respect to the ground will depend on what the value of F is...the top block's acceleration with respect to the ground is independent of the value of F. What value would you use for friction, mu k or mu s?
Welcome to PF, zhaos!
 


Hi PhantomJay

Thanks for your reply. Since the block is slipping we would use mu k.
I think the situation is now..
F - muk * m1 g = m2 * a [for block 2]
and
muk * m1 g = m1 * a' [for block 1]
(a' not the same as a)
Ah so I see what you mean about a' being independent of F. Thanks.
 


Yes, that looks very good.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top