Fringe spacing of the Interference pattern due to two Coherent waves

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a homework problem related to fringe spacing in interference patterns created by two coherent waves. The original poster expresses confusion about how to start the problem, particularly regarding the impact of oblique incidence on the resulting patterns. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding relevant equations, such as those for fringe width and phase differences, and suggest reviewing previous materials or external sources for clarity. There is a clear insistence on the need for the poster to attempt a solution rather than relying solely on assistance. The conversation highlights the educational approach of encouraging self-learning in physics problems related to wave interference.
Baibhab Bose
Messages
34
Reaction score
3
Homework Statement
In the attached image.
Relevant Equations
formulas of fringe width and phase differences I think.
Homework Statement: In the attached image.
Homework Equations: formulas of fringe width and phase differences I think.

It has been a long time since I have dealt with these kinds of interference/fringewidth problem, I can't figure out a way to start solving this problem. I was thinking about what the spacing between each of these wave-lines signify, and exactly which of them would create the pattern. Because of its oblique incidence, each wave would individually create patterns, so how do the two patterns make a final one?i think the fringewidth of the final pattern is asked here!
 

Attachments

  • New Doc 2019-08-25 15.32.58.jpg
    New Doc 2019-08-25 15.32.58.jpg
    59.2 KB · Views: 256
Physics news on Phys.org
Baibhab Bose said:
Because of its oblique incidence, each wave would individually create patterns
No. What makes you think that ?
Equations: formulas of fringe width and phase differences I think.
Way PF works is that you list the relevant equations and post an attempt at solution.
So re-read your old stuff or read up from some other source...
We don't give classes you missed or forgot and we don't do your homework -- it would only rob you from the rxercise...
 
  • Like
Likes Baibhab Bose
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top