B Fulcrum point loads

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter rodgthedodge
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Adding an ebike to the rear carrier of a motorhome increases the load on the rear axle significantly more than the bike's weight. The calculation involves using moments to determine the additional weight on the rear wheels, which is found to be approximately 57 kg. This weight is derived from the distance of the ebike from the front axle and the forces involved. The front axle weight decreases slightly, but the focus remains on the rear axle's increased load. Proper calculations are essential for safe weight distribution in motorhomes.
rodgthedodge
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
I have a motorhome and I want to calculate the extra weight I am applying to my rear axle by adding my ebike to the rear carrier. I have searched and found a counterbalance formula (added in the image) my question is do I just add the CBW to the fulcrum point. i.e rear axle weight calculation = 1900kgs +35kgs+21.85kgs new rear axle weight = 1956kgs, confused? confused.
cbw.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

Adding the 35 kg ebike to the rear will add more than 35 kg to the rear axle.
It will also reduce the weight on the front axle by less than 35 kg.

What are the axle weights now ?
 
Welcome, @rodgthedodge !
Can you add the counterweight further forward?
Any way to improve the rear suspension?
 
rodgthedodge said:
I have a motorhome and I want to calculate the extra weight I am applying to my rear axle by adding my ebike to the rear carrier.
Your calculation is correct, but confusing. Since you only want to calculate the extra weight from the ebike, you can ignore the weight of the motorhome. We do this by summing moments. A moment is a force multiplied by the distance from that force to a point. We can put that point where we want, so we choose that point so as to make the calculation as easy as possible. Since we want to find the extra weight on the rear wheels, that point will be the front wheels. The free body diagram then looks as follows:
Ebike FBD.jpg

The moment for the ebike is 6.5 m X 35 kg = 227.5 kg-m. The rear wheel load is unknown, but shown in the opposite direction, so we name it F, and the moment is 4 m X F = 4F kg-m. The sum of moments equals zero, so 227.5 - 4F = 0. Solve for F, and F = 227.5 / 4 = 56.875 kg. Round to the nearest kg, and the additional load is 57 kg. You can add that to the weight on the rear wheels to get the total weight on the rear wheels with the ebike.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top