Fundamental frequency of a wire wheel spoke

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the fundamental frequency of a wire wheel spoke given its dimensions and tension. The spoke's length is 9.5 cm, diameter 3.5 mm, and tension 2100 N, with steel density at 7860 kg/m³. The initial calculation for the linear mass density (μ) was incorrect due to using the diameter instead of the radius. After correcting this error, the recalculated fundamental frequency is 877 Hz, which is confirmed as correct. Accurate use of parameters is crucial for solving such physics problems effectively.
Any Help
Messages
79
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


The spoke of a wire wheel is 9.5 cm long, 3.5 mm in diameter, and under tension of 2100 N. The wire is made of steel of density 7860 kg/m3. When struck with a metal tool at its center, the spoke rings at its fundamental frequency. What is that frequency?

Homework Equations


λn.fn=v and velocity:v=sqrt(T/μ) , lemda λn=2L/n and L= length of string
fn=n/2L . sqrt(T/μ)
fundamental≡ the first mode ⇒ n=1
μ is the linear mass and must be in kg/m so we must multiply our density by the area which is π.r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


μ=7860*π*(3.5*10^-3)^2=0.302 kg/m
f=1/(2*9.5*10^-2) . sqrt(2100/0.302)
f= 438.8 Hz
but the answer is incorrect why??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I've changed your thread title to more accurately describe the particular problem. Please choose thread titles that are not too general.

Any Help said:
μ=7860*π*(3.5*10^-3)^2=0.302 kg/m
Were you given the radius of the spoke?
 
  • Like
Likes Any Help
gneill said:
Were you given the radius of the spoke?
Ah okay. Thanks very much. I used the diameter as a radius wrongly. :)
Now it will be 877Hz which is the correct answer
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top