Fundamental Solution for Nonhomogeneous Heat Equation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around solving the nonhomogeneous heat equation represented by the partial differential equation (PDE) u_t - Δu + cu = f, with initial condition u(x,0) = g(x). The key breakthrough was achieved by substituting u(x,t) = e^{-ct}v(x,t), transforming the problem into a simpler form where v(x,t) satisfies the equation v_t - Δv = f(x,t)e^{ct} with initial condition v(x,0) = g(x). This method effectively reduces the complexity of the original equation and provides a clear path to the solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with the heat equation and its fundamental solutions
  • Knowledge of initial value problems in the context of PDEs
  • Experience with mathematical transformations and substitutions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of fundamental solutions for the heat equation
  • Explore methods for solving nonhomogeneous PDEs
  • Learn about the application of the method of characteristics in PDEs
  • Investigate the implications of the Laplacian operator in various coordinate systems
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, researchers in applied mathematics, and anyone involved in solving partial differential equations, particularly in the context of heat transfer and diffusion processes.

µ³
Messages
68
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



So I'm trying to solve Evans - PDE 2.5 # 12...

"Write down an explicit formula for a solution of

u_t - \Delta u + cu=f with (x,t) \in R^n \times (0,\infty)
u(x,0)=g(x)"

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution



I figure if I can a fundamental solution for

u_t - \Delta u + cu = 0,

The rest follows through straight forward. I've tried multiplying the solution to the heat equation by a number of terms such as e^{-ct}, e^{v(x,t)}, but everything I've tried so far either gives me a non-fundamental solution, or a non-linear pde.

I've also tried mimicking the two ways they give to finding the solution to the original equation but neither seem to work. Looking for solutions of the form u(x,t) = v(x^2/t) and looking for solutions of the form u(x,t) = 1/t^\beta v(x/t^\alpha) but neither seems to reduce the equation in the problem to a single variables

Any hints?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yay, figured it out.

letting u(x,t)=e^{-ct}v(x,t), with v(x,t) solving

v_t - \Delta v = f(x,t) e^{ct}
v(x,0) = g(x)

Solves the original equation. I guess I was just thinking too hard.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K