Funnel vs Cylinder: Find Out Which Is More Efficient for Pouring Water

  • Thread starter Thread starter Melawrghk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cylinder
AI Thread Summary
Using a funnel for pouring water is more efficient than a cylinder due to its design, which prevents spillage and allows for faster pouring. The funnel's shape ensures that all the water is directed into the recipient without the risk of the container falling in, unlike a cylinder. Additionally, the pressure dynamics differ between the two shapes, affecting how water flows and is retained. The funnel's wider opening allows for a more forgiving pouring process, requiring less precision and reducing the likelihood of mess. Overall, these factors contribute to the funnel's effectiveness in various practical applications.
Melawrghk
Messages
140
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Pretend you have a container into which you're pouring water. We often use funnels, but why? Like if you have a funnel with the same exit radius as a cylinder, why is using a funnel more efficient?

The area still says the same, so I don't know. Help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe because a funnel won't fall into the recipient you are filling while a cylinder would!
 
I could glue the cylinder onto the recipient :D

Could it be because pressure changes differently between the two shapes? Cylinder loses the volume of water and height of water linearly. But a even if a cone loses same amount of water by volume, it would be different by height?
 
Melawrghk said:
I could glue the cylinder onto the recipient :D

Could it be because pressure changes differently between the two shapes? Cylinder loses the volume of water and height of water linearly. But a even if a cone loses same amount of water by volume, it would be different by height?

This is right. But why would pressure be a problem? If it is a problem then it explains it all, but if you use it for cooking or things like that I think it's because the funnel simply don't fall into the recipient and also because you don't have to be very precise (accurate) when you pour the water into the funnel since it's almost sure all the water will get on the funnel and not on the floor. While when pouring water in a thin cylinder requires more accuracy from your part and you can't also pour water with it as fast as with a same volume funnel.
 
Well it's for my project, and I'm supposed to justify use of cone as opposed to having just an open (cylindrical) end. I think I'll be able to develop an argument from this. Thanks tons!
 
Ok good luck then! I'm hoping for someone to point out any other information we might be missing.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top