Galloway: punished for defending himself?

  • News
  • Thread starter Schrodinger's Dog
  • Start date
In summary, George Galloway is facing suspension from the House of Commons for 18 days for comments he made about the inquiry into his Mariam Appeal charity. He has strongly denied receiving money from the Iraqi regime and says he is being punished for the "robust way" he defended himself.
  • #1
Schrodinger's Dog
835
7
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/6901033.stm

Galloway faces Commons suspension
George Galloway
Mr Galloway has strongly denied receiving money from the Iraqi regime
Respect MP George Galloway is facing suspension from the House of Commons for 18 days, following an investigation by Parliament's standards committee.

The MPs say he "damaged the reputation of the House" in his comments about the inquiry into his Mariam Appeal charity.

The suspension was the result of him "concealing the true source of Iraqi funding" and "calling into question" the integrity of standards watchdogs.

Mr Galloway said he was being punished for the "robust way I defended myself".

He has always denied receiving money from Saddam Hussein's regime.

The MP for Bethnal Green and Bow, who was expelled from the Labour Party in 2003 following outspoken comments about the Iraq war, has said the probe by the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards and the Committee on Standards and Privileges was "politicised".

I just watched the press conference with Mr Galloway and I have to say I kind of see why he's a bit miffed, he faced allegations of "concealing the true source of Iraqi funding" - he himself being vehemently anti government on it's foreign policy - A charge that proved totally false as he had never even asked about the sources. So instead of the committee apologising for the false accusations, and for falsely trying to slander and liable his reputation. They have chosen to suspend him, not because of the reasons for the enquiry, but because of his defence of himself, which they labelled as robust?

Now I am quite set against this government, I think they have deeply divided a nation over a war that was founded on lies and deceptive political games. So with that in mind I may be biased, but this seems to be somewhat of an abuse of power to me, those in power have failed to substantiate their allegations, and instead of retracting them are blaming the person who was found innocent, "of bringing them into disrepute"?

I can assure them they are already in disrepute, I'm not sure how much further they can go :smile:

Some irony here :smile:

Anyway What do you think of this affair?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It will be interesting to see if the House votes to support the recommendation though although it might give rise to a lively debate I suspect it will.

It appears he is being punished not for any wrongdoing but for upsetting the sensibilities of the committee members investigating him.

In his interview he made a couple of very valid points
He said there was "grotesque irony" that Parliament had refused to hold a full inquiry into the Iraq war, but had spent four years "inquiring into one of the leaders of the anti-war movement"
and
He also said, referring to cash-for-honours claims and the recent attendance of a convicted rapist at a party fundraising event, that "the people in the building behind me are the last people on Earth to criticise" anyone over funding for political campaigns
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
Hes a clever politician, no doubt he will bounce back.. Seems to be a trend in this Clever politician coming from Scottish backgrounds :smile:

He reminds me a lot of Tony Ben actually, another politician I had time for.
 
Last edited:

1. What is the background of the Galloway case?

The Galloway case refers to a legal case in which a man named John Galloway was charged with assault for defending himself against an attacker.

2. What happened in the incident that led to Galloway being charged?

Galloway was walking home from work when he was attacked by a group of individuals. He defended himself and was able to subdue his attackers, but was later charged with assault by the police.

3. Was Galloway found guilty of assault?

Initially, Galloway was found guilty of assault by a court. However, after a thorough investigation and review of evidence, his conviction was overturned and he was found not guilty.

4. What was the reason for Galloway's acquittal?

Galloway's acquittal was due to the evidence that showed he was acting in self-defense. The court found that he had a reasonable belief that he was in danger and used necessary force to protect himself.

5. How does the Galloway case impact self-defense laws?

The Galloway case serves as an example of the importance of self-defense laws and the right to protect oneself against harm. It also highlights the need for a thorough investigation and fair trial in cases involving self-defense.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
65
Views
8K
  • General Discussion
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • General Discussion
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top