Gap Conduction in Nuclear Fuel rod Performance Codes

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on gap conduction calculation models in nuclear fuel performance codes, specifically the FRAPCON package. The original poster seeks assistance in gathering output results from various codes for comparative analysis, noting that many fuel performance codes are proprietary and not readily accessible. Participants suggest exploring published manuals to understand gap models and highlight the differences between open and closed gaps, which are influenced by factors like gas composition and contact resistance. They recommend using a gas mixture model for accurate calculations, considering heat flux and gap thickness. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of gap conduction due to dependencies on power and burnup.
pouyan.najafi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi, everyone!
I'm doing a research in gap conduction calculation models in popular nuclear fuel performance codes. I want to make a sensitive analysis in their behaviors, but unfortunately, I just have access to FRAPCON package. is there anyone who can help me to gather some of the codes outputs results for the same input?
I will be really appreciated.
Contact: najafi.pouyan@gmail.com
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
pouyan.najafi said:
Hi, everyone!
I'm doing a research in gap conduction calculation models in popular nuclear fuel performance codes. I want to make a sensitive analysis in their behaviors, but unfortunately, I just have access to FRAPCON package. is there anyone who can help me to gather some of the codes outputs results for the same input?
I will be really appreciated.
Contact: najafi.pouyan@gmail.com
What does one mean by popular?

Frapcon is readily available to academia and licensing authorities. Otherwise, fuel performance codes are proprietary, and not accessible without a license.

One could look at published manuals and probably determine the gap models. Is this for open, closed, or open and closed gaps. The open gap is influenced by assumptions of gas composition, mixing and jump distances in the fuel and cladding, whereas closed gap depends on contact resistance.

One could use a gas mixture model for He, Xe, Kr, and may be some air, or nitrogen, since oxygen usually interacts with the metal cladding, and make some reasonable calculations knowing heat flux and gap thickness. An integrated code of course will also compute gap with fuel thermal expansion and cladding creepdown, so gap will be power and burnup dependent.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top